MYNORTHWEST NEWS

City of Seattle sued; head tax signatures submitted anyway

Jun 14, 2018, 12:35 PM | Updated: 3:38 pm

head tax, seattle city council, saul spady...

The Seattle City Council discusses a head tax repeal. (File, Associated Press)

(File, Associated Press)

The City of Seattle is being sued for violating the state’s Open Public Meetings Act over the special meeting that resulted in the end to its short-lived head tax. The lawsuit led to the No Tax on Jobs Coalition filing the 46,000 signatures it gathered to send the issue to the November ballot.

RELATED: Seattle head tax 101

The Seattle Times first reported that James Egan, Julie Kays, and Lincoln Beauregard filed the lawsuit in King County Superior Court.

Beauregard says the allegations stem from the possibility that seven of the nine council members agreed to repeal the head tax before announcing the special meeting on Tuesday, June 12.

“It sounds like they reached a consensus and had a debate outside of public view and then announced it,” Beauregard told KIRO Radio. “And then they also didn’t announce it with the proper 24-hour timeline.”

Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the No Tax on Jobs Coalition submitted nearly 46,000 signatures in favor of a referendum. The referendum would be placed on the November ballot, giving Seattle voters the ultimate decision over whether or not the city should tax Seattle’s largest companies. Coalitions spokesperson John Murray told The Times they decided to file the signatures “out of an abundance of caution.”

The lawsuit seeks for the mayor and the council members to be fined. It does not seek a reversal of the 7-2 vote that put an end to the head tax. However, if a court finds that the council was in violation of the law, it could make the head tax repeal vote “null and void,” the Times points out. This prompted concern with the No Tax on Jobs Coalition causing them to submit the signatures — just in case — hours before the submission deadline Thursday.

Mayor advised

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan has been advised by City Attorney Pete Holmes that he believes the council met the requirements of the Open Public Meetings Act. The mayor is not a member of the council governing body. Meetings are scheduled by the council president, Bruce Harrell.

In an email to the mayor, Holmes notes that a special meeting requires 24 hour notice to local newspapers and radio stations, and posted at the main entrance of the council chambers.

“Notice of the June 12, 2018 noon meeting was physically posted at the main entrance to the Council chambers on June 11, 2018 at 11:57 a.m. The notice was also transmitted to the City Council’s web service contractor, Legistar, at 11:55 a.m. Finally, an email to certain media organizations was sent at 12:10 p.m.” Holmes writes.

Holme’s email further states that despite media being notified at 12:10 p.m. (10 minutes less than 24 hour notice) of the meeting, he believes that the media was immediately aware of the meeting, citing social media posts about it at 12:12 p.m. Holmes argues that the council chambers were filled during the meeting and council heard more than an hour of public comments on the issue. He says that since there was full engagement in the meeting by residents, media, and the council, the city met requirements of the Open Public Meetings Act.

Special meeting lawsuit

According to state law, city councils — and other government bodies — must conduct business openly, including deliberations. A majority of the council cannot meet outside of a public meeting to discuss future action. Even if there isn’t a physical meeting between council members, they can be in violation of the law if there was a serial meeting.

The law reads:

“No governing body of a public agency shall adopt any ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, order, or directive, except in a meeting open to the public and then only at a meeting, the date of which is fixed by law or rule, or at a meeting of which notice has been given according to the provisions of this chapter. Any action taken at meetings failing to comply with the provisions of this subsection shall be null and void.”

Further:

“No governing body of a public agency at any meeting required to be open to the public shall vote by secret ballot. Any vote taken in violation of this subsection shall be null and void, and shall be considered an “action” under this chapter.”

MyNorthwest News

KIRO Newsradio gracie awards...

MyNorthwest Staff

KIRO Newsradio anchors receive Gracie Awards for outstanding work

Heather Bosch and Lisa Brooks, anchors at KIRO Newsradio, have been honored by the Alliance for Women in Media with prestigious Gracie Awards.

2 hours ago

Kia Boys...

Kate Stone, KIRO Newsradio and Bill Kaczaraba, MyNorthwest

‘Kia Boys’ allegedly execute a crime spree in south King County

Renton police chased down a 14-and 16-year-old but are still looking for two other teen suspects in what they said was a "crime spree" in south King County.

3 hours ago

Spanaway woman shot dead...

Kate Stone

Search for shooter continues after woman shot dead while driving in Spanaway

A 47-year-old woman was shot dead in Spanaway, causing her to hit another driver head-on early Wednesday morning.

5 hours ago

nintendo redmond...

Frank Sumrall

Nintendo to lay off 86 Redmond employees this spring

Nintendo of America is laying off 86 contract workers in Redmond, beginning May 25, due to company reorganization.

5 hours ago

Everett boy missing...

Sam Campbell

4-year-old Everett boy missing, police worried he’s in danger

Police and Search and Rescue crews are looking for a missing four-year-old boy they suspect could be in danger.

7 hours ago

Image: The awnings of a store advertise the sale of lottery tickets, including Mega Millions and Po...

Steve Coogan

Lottery jackpots update: Powerball prize jumps again after $1.1B Mega Millions win

A lottery jackpots update: The Powerball prize reached an estimated $935 million ahead of Saturday night's drawing.

16 hours ago

City of Seattle sued; head tax signatures submitted anyway