Washington Supreme Court rules on 'sleep sex' defense

BY Brandi Kruse  on October 25, 2012 @ 2:39 pm (Updated: 3:11 pm - 10/25/12 )

A woman who claimed she was asleep when she had sex with an underage boy will have to prove that defense at trial.

The state Supreme Court ruled that Lindy Deer presented an "affirmative defense," meaning the burden of proof does not fall on the prosecution.

"We will not have the burden of proving that she was awake," said King County Deputy Prosecutor Andrea Vitalich. "She will have the burden of proving, by preponderance, that she was asleep when these acts occurred."

Prosecutors claim Deer had sex with a 15-year-old boy on multiple occasions in 2006. She was 52 at the time.

In 2009, a jury convicted her on three-counts of child rape, but the conviction was overturned due to an error in charging documents.

Prosecutors plan to try the case again, but asked the state Supreme Court to rule on who should have the burden of proof if Deer were to present her "sleep sex" defense at trial.

Seven of the court's nine justices sided with the prosecution and said the burden should be on the defense.

Lila Silverstein, an attorney with the Washington Appellate Project, represented Deer on appeal. She calls the state Supreme Court decision "dangerous," and said it violates due process.

She pointed to a more common scenario, such as a woman who is "drugged," then raped by an underage boy.

"The question in this case is, 'Who bears the burden of proving which one of those people is telling the truth? Which one of those people did commit the act?'" she said. "Our position is it has to be the state that bears that burden."

Brandi Kruse, KIRO Radio Reporter
Brandi Kruse is a reporter for KIRO Radio who is as spontaneous and adventurous in her free time as she is on the job. Brandi arrived at KIRO Radio in March 2011 and has already collected three regional Edward R. Murrow awards for her reporting.
More Local News
Top Stories

  • Soda Pop Stop
    The mayors of Seattle, New York and about a dozen other cities want to ban this

  • 'I Am A God'
    Critics say Kanye West's album will change music forever

  • A Skeptic's Doubts
    An ESPN columnist doubts Russell Wilson will ever be elite
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (3)


  • Add A Comment

  • Cash wrote...
    Now
    October 25, 2012 4:14 pm
    If the same court would apply the same rules to those caught in stolen cars and in possession of stolen property that they need to prove they did not know it was stolen instead of them saying they did not know being good enough... Only in this state...
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Ted Bundi wrote...
    Oh man, my tax money is being spent on this.
    October 25, 2012 6:45 pm
    Can't wait for the lawsuit coming up against the state on behalf of the young man.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }