classroom2-ap.jpg
The Washington Education Association is opposing a bill that would allow principals not to renew a teacher who is assigned to their school after being displaced somewhere else in the district. The WEA says it gives principals an unfair advantage. Proponents of the bill say good teachers would have no problem finding a new job, and bad teachers shouldn't be rewarded with a classroom full of kids.

New bill would give principals more flexibility to fire displaced teachers

BY Kim Shepard  on February 1, 2013 @ 12:41 pm (Updated: 1:39 pm - 2/1/13 )

A state senator wants to make it easier for principals to fire under-performing teachers who have been displaced.

Senator Steve Litzow, chair of the Senate Committee on Early Learning and K-12 Education, says he was prompted by new state rules which will require schools be graded on their performance starting in the 2013-2014 school year.

"The feedback I've received from principals are, 'If you're going to hold me accountable to this, then I need more flexibility in creating my own team that's best for my community,'" Litzow told the committee on Friday.

Teachers can be displaced for a variety of reasons. If their program is cut, the size of school enrollment drops or a school board decides to change their staffing formula, a teacher may be forced to move.

Under current bargaining agreements with teachers' unions, they are generally guaranteed continued employment at a different school in the same district.

Seattle public school teacher Kristine Bailey Fogerty told the Education Committee, some teachers feel entitled to a new job when an old one dries up.

She recalled a conversation she had with one displaced teacher who said he didn't know where his next job would take him and he didn't really care.

"That bothered me. We have a terribly broken system if we have a system where teachers who don't care are rewarded with the great privilege and the great responsibility of having a classroom full of children," said Fogerty.

She told the panel good teachers would have no problem finding a new job. What she loves most about Senate Bill 5242 is that it expects teachers to be hirable.

The Washington Education Association argued the bill would give principals absolute veto power. The WEA's Lucinda Young said that's not fair to teachers.

"We also believe this legislation will provide chaos for HR departments at best, and at worst it will create legal and financial liabilities for districts," said Young.

The proposal would require a one-year grace period for teachers to try and find a new position before the non-renewal process could begin.

Kim Shepard, KIRO Radio Reporter
Kim Shepard is a news anchor and reporter for KIRO Radio and the office optimist. She's energetic, quick to laugh and has a positive outlook on life.
More Local News
Top Stories
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (5)


  • Add A Comment

  • shark75 wrote...
    Wow, legislation needs to be passed to achieve this???
    February 1, 2013 1:09 pm
    How I long for the day when unions are chucked onto the ash heap of history. They drag our society down and force us to accept mediocrity.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • ka7isle wrote...
    Mediocrity in the teaching profession
    February 16, 2013 4:54 pm
    If medioctrity means having the desire and commitment to put 50-plus hours a week toward a large group of extremely diverse learners of varying abilities, how would you define exceptional?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Fuego wrote...
    Funny how
    February 1, 2013 1:35 pm
    adding accountability is making the Principals ask for hire/fire authority. This is a no brainer in the private sector yet it seems to be causing the union all kinds of grief.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • luckedout wrote...
    Makes sense...
    February 1, 2013 1:40 pm
    This is how the private sector works. You lose your job due to a layoff and you have to go find a new position. It also makes sense for principals to have more control over who teaches at their schools. Also, the statement about the HR departments being thrown into chaos is ridiculous. Plenty of businesses go through this everyday without any chaos. Why is a school's HR department any different? If they can't handle such a standard job, maybe they shouldn't be working in HR.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • xplanes wrote...
    In other words
    February 1, 2013 2:22 pm
    "We also believe this legislation will provide chaos for HR departments at best, and at worst it will create legal and financial liabilities for districts," said Young. What the union is saying in other words...if this passes we will sue every time a teacher is let go for other than budget reasons. That my friends and liberals is called extortion. That's how we got here in the first place and that is how government employees will make sure we don't get it fixed.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }