Drone
Boeing subsidiary Insitu is based in Bingen, Wash., but they are unable to test their drones here. They have purchased a private airfield in Eastern Oregon to conduct their flight testing. (Photo of the ScanEagle system courtesy of insitu.com)

Washington could become the new home for drone testing

BY Kim Shepard  on February 25, 2013 @ 4:58 am (Updated: 8:30 am - 2/25/13 )

After a public uproar about privacy concerns, the Seattle Police Department is returning a pair of aerial drones to the federal government.

But, state officials say there is too much money to be made to give up on the technology entirely. The Governor's Office of Aerospace is heading an effort that could make our state a proving ground for the unmanned aerial vehicles or UVAs.

In February of 2012, Congress ordered the Federal Aviation Administration to find a way to incorporate UAVs into public air space. The FAA was given a 2015 deadline to designate six testing sites across the country.

Just this month, the FAA has finally notified the states they are ready to start receiving applications.

"We know that this is a growing industry. If there are only six sites across the country, we think the places that receive the FAA designation are going to be magnets for economic activity," says Alex Pietsch, Director of the Governor's Office of Aerospace.

Pietsch is leading a consortium of public and private groups that hope the federal designation of "Unmanned Aircraft Systems Test Site" will be made for an air range in Washington state.

The entities involved include the University of Washington, Washington State University and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

There is no federal money attached to this designation. Funding will have to come later. After an air range is approved in Washington, Pietsch says they plan to create an LLC or non-profit group that would seek private partners willing to put up some cash.

The consortium has already decided the best site for the drone testing facility would be Grant County International Airport in Eastern Washington. It's a former Air Force Base, has a working FAA control tower, and is highly underutilized. In addition, the airport is centrally located and offers a wide variety of landscapes nearby.

Pietsch says they plan to ask the FAA to designate Grays Harbor, west of Olympia, as a satellite region for blue-water testing. There is also a possibility of other satellite zones in the future. Each of them would require separate FAA approval.

"So, the hub of the activity would be Moses Lake, but we think there would be other satellite opportunities in other parts of the state," says Pietsch.

While they work toward creating an aviation plan and a business plan, Pietsch says they will keep citizens' privacy in mind. He says a huge portion of the procurement documents from the FAA revolve around what plans are being made at the site to maintain civil liberties.

Despite concerns, Pietsch believes the test site designation is not only important for the hundreds, and possibly thousands, of jobs it could bring to Washington, but also for supporting our existing aerospace industry.

Washington has over 1,250 aerospace related companies. Many of them, including Boeing, are already working in the UAV market.

"But there are not test ranges for them to test their vehicles," says Pietsch. "We talked to a company that has a presence in Issaquah, but their parent company bought an air field in Tel Aviv and they have to fly their crews over there to do their testing."

According to Pietsch, Washington has a good chance at being chosen by the FAA to host a UAV proving ground, but the competition will be tough.

"I think every state in the nation is going to be interested in this. It's a significant development economic play," Pietsch says.

The FAA has set a May 6 application deadline for any state hoping to get the "Unmanned Aircraft Systems Test Site" designation.

Kim Shepard, KIRO Radio Reporter
Kim Shepard is a news anchor and reporter for KIRO Radio and the office optimist. She's energetic, quick to laugh and has a positive outlook on life.
More Local News
Top Stories

  • One
    Microsoft calls its new Xbox 'truly intelligent TV'

  • Otherworldly
    Amazon has new plans for huge biospheres on its new campus

  • Nature's Reality Check
    We can conquer terrorism, cure cancer, but a tornado can remind us of our insecurity
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (8)


  • Add A Comment

  • Rick W7PSK wrote...
    Seattle Already said NO to drones
    February 25, 2013 5:44 am
    now here is our DUMB A $$ governor trying to invite them in.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Newton wrote...
    I saw one flying over my small City.
    February 25, 2013 10:01 am
    It was all black with the tail fins pointed down. I was shocked!. It looked pretty darn evil. Of course no windows with a bulbess like front end on it. I don't like it. It was traveling at about 500 ft up kinda slow cameras pointed down prop in the back. Very quite couldn't hear it at all. Scary!!.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CldWtrSrf wrote...
    Yup, I've seen the as well.
    February 25, 2013 12:56 pm
    It's CREEPY how quiet they are.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    There is no federal money attached to this designation. Funding will have to come later.
    February 25, 2013 1:03 pm
    Ah, funding from the magical, Federal money tree. The one that constantly produces "revenue" our of thin air. Wake up America. Your DimoRats have bankrupted us all.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Chris Halliday wrote...
    Drone me baby!
    February 25, 2013 2:20 pm
    I don't see the problem people have with drones. There's already cameras watching you where you shop, work, on the streets, etc.. What's the problem with drones? They've proven effective in combat as many inventions do before they integrate into the private sector. If you're not breaking the law, what's the problem with being watched by a drone? Newton says they're Scary!?! I don't get it. Watch my back drone. I may need those tapes for evidence some day. Scary!! That's a laugh. I'm glad they're quiet. They won't wake me up when they bust some moron breaking into my, or my neihbor's house.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CldWtrSrf wrote...
    Chris Halliday said "If you're not breaking the law, what's the problem with being watched by a drone?"
    February 26, 2013 10:49 am
    So, by your logic, what's the problem with the government illegally tapping your phones? I mean, if you "aren't doing anything wrong", why would you care if the government is illegally spying on you? Don't be stupid, it's not about if you are or aren't doing something wrong. We have this thing called The Constitution and Bill of Rights. I know, a lot of people, mostly so called "Liberals" but plenty of so called "Conservatives" think of it as an outdated dirty little thing. Fact is though, it's the LAW of the Land, and the Criminal Government is VIOLATING it on a daily basis.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • murr wrote...
    Drone testing ????
    March 21, 2013 2:56 am
    In seattle's mayor's seat.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }