Red light camera initiatives struck down againon February 26, 2013 @ 8:20 am (Updated: 10:33 am - 2/26/13 )
The state court of appeals ruled on Monday that citizen's advisory initiatives, those that aren't binding, cannot be used to get rid of red light cameras.
This comes from a case in Monroe where a citizen's group tried to voice their displeasure over the city's red light cameras.
The city sued to prevent the advisory vote citing state law that red light cameras are not subject to local initiatives.
The court of appeals ruled the power to legislate the use of these cameras is given exclusively to the governing body of a city and not the electorate.
It supports a State Supreme Court ruling last year involving the red light cameras in Mukilteo. In that case, voters tried a binding initiative to remove the cameras. The high court cited the same state law, and the case was tossed out.
Activist Tim Eyman had his hands in both cases, and he calls the decisions "frightening."
"For the first time in our state's history, the courts have now made it illegal for the citizens of the state of Washington to even express an opinion on certain topics," he said.
Activist Tim Eyman has put an initiative on the November ballot that would allow these initiatives to continue.
Meet the Mariners' new second baseman, Robinson Cano
The legal marijuana industry might make a lot of cash, but there's nowhere to deposit
The Holiday Map
Find Santa photos, tree farms, lights & seasonal events with our holiday map
Please login below with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing MyNorthwest account holders will need to create a new Disqus account or use one of the social logins provided below. Thank you.