Japan watchdog to halt test reactor over safetyMay 15, 2013 @ 8:25 am
TOKYO (AP) - Japan's nuclear watchdog announced Wednesday that a trouble-plagued next-generation test reactor will not be allowed to restart due to safety violations, dealing a setback to the country's pro-nuclear government.
The Nuclear Regulation Authority's decision is the latest blow to the Monju fast-breeder reactor and Japan's nuclear fuel cycle program. The government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is hoping that Monju will be a key part of Japan's plans for disposing of atomic waste and reducing the nation's plutonium stockpile.
Also on Wednesday, a panel of geologists concluded that a seismic fault running underneath a separate commercial reactor near Monju is active, in a rare ruling that could force the scrapping of that reactor.
Monju uses plutonium fuel instead of conventional uranium and produces radioactive substances that can be reused as fuel. After nearly 50 years in the works, the reactor, located in the city of Tsuruga in western Japan, is still struggling to get online.
The watchdog's five commissioners unanimously agreed that the reactor's operator, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, "is not ready to sufficiently secure the safety of Monju." They said the operator had repeatedly failed to conduct mandatory inspections on an array of equipment and come up with improvement plans.
Many experts have said Monju is a basket case and that Japan should abandon plans to achieve a full nuclear fuel cycle. The previous government tried to terminate Monju under its nuclear phase-out plan, but Abe's government quickly reversed course as it pushed to restart commercial reactors that have been idle since a March 2011 earthquake and tsunami triggered a nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant.
Only two of Japan's 50 commercial reactors are currently generating power.
Monju's operator can appeal the watchdog's decision, but an official suspension order is likely to come by the end of May, regulatory officials said. The operator needs at least until January to catch up with the delays in safety checks, but it is unknown when the suspension order can be lifted.
Watchdog chairman Shunichi Tanaka told reporters that Monju's operator lacked a "safety culture" and deserved severe action.
"They repeated the same mistakes even though they said they were analyzing the root cause of the problem. I think they lack fundamental understanding about safety," Tanaka said. "Despite the lessons we learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident, it seems a safety culture is still insufficient in Japan."
Japan built Monju as a "dream reactor" to fulfill its energy needs, with the reactor meant to be a centerpiece of a self-sustainable fuel cycle. To complete the cycle, Japan has been building the Rokkasho fuel recycling plant in northern Japan to extract uranium and plutonium from spent fuel and fabricate hybrid fuel made from the two radioactive elements.
But with both Monju and Rokkasho having technical problems, Japan has built up a large stockpile of plutonium extracted overseas and at home, causing international proliferation concerns.
Monju successfully generated power using MOX _ mixed oxide fuel, a mix of uranium and plutonium _ in 1995, but months later, a massive leakage of cooling sodium caused a fire. Monju had another test run in 2010 but stopped again after a fuel exchanger fell into the reactor vessel.
Regulators who inspected Monju said its top management lacked safety-first principles, and workers were demoralized without prospects for a startup. Their interviews with plant workers also revealed they had to keep inspection and maintenance records using massive amounts of paperwork instead of a computer database, and they were always on deadline to meet a test run schedule.
"It's too dangerous for Monju to start operation now," said Yasushi Morishita, the watchdog's director of nuclear regulation. "The plant was so poorly managed."
Some experts also suspect that the Monju reactor sits on an active seismic fault. An independent team commissioned by the Nuclear Regulation Authority is to inspect possible faults at Monju later this year.
Possible seismic faults are being investigated near several other plants, leaving some reactors in limbo as plant operators scramble to upgrade their equipment and emergency steps ahead of the July launch of new safety standards required for their resumption.
On Wednesday, a watchdog-commissioned panel of geologists determined that the fault line underneath the Tsuruga No. 2 reactor was active and likely moved relatively recently _ about 120,000-130,000 years ago.
Japanese guidelines prohibit key parts of nuclear plants, including reactors, from sitting above active faults. The panel's finding means Tsuruga's No. 2 reactor will have to be scrapped unless its operator provides new data overriding the decision.
"It was truly fortunate that there was no accident at the plant. Today we took a first step to improve its safety," said watchdog commissioner Kunihiko Shimazaki. He praised the watchdog for making a decision against the interests of nuclear promoters, unlike its predecessors.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said the government respects the decision. "Safety comes first when it comes to nuclear power," he said.
But Tsuruga's operator, the Japan Atomic Power Co., balked at the decision, accusing the watchdog of neglecting the utility's findings. Company officials say the decision will serious financial consequences for the utility.
"The judgment is truly regrettable and unacceptable," company president Yasuo Hanada said in a statement, demanding a re-examination by the watchdog.
(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Amazon has new plans for huge biospheres on its new campus
Microsoft calls its new Xbox 'truly intelligent TV'
Seattle's Skillet Street Food and its creator are growing way beyond the Airstream
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.