Wash. state considers gender-neutral language bill

February 3, 2013 @ 1:32 pm

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - In Washington state, dairymen, freshmen and even penmanship could soon be things of the past.

Over the past six years, state officials have engaged in the onerous task of changing the language used in the state's copious laws, including thousands of words and phrases, many written more than a century ago when the idea of women working on police forces or on fishing boats wasn't a consideration.

That process is slated to draw to a close this year. So while the state has already welcomed "firefighters," "clergy" and "police officers" into its lexicon, "ombuds" (in place of ombudsman) and "security guards" (previously "watchmen,") appear to be next, along with "dairy farmers," "first-year students" and "handwriting."

"Some people would say `oh, it's not a big thing, do you really have to go through the process of changing the language,'" said Seattle Councilmember Sally Clark who was one of the catalysts for the change. "But language matters. It's how we signal a level of respect for each other."

About half of all U.S. states have moved toward such gender-neutral language at varying levels, from drafting bills to changing state constitutions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Florida and Minnesota have already completely revised their laws as Washington state is doing.

The final installment of Washington state's bill already has sailed through the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee with unanimous approval. The nearly 500-page bill has one more committee stop scheduled before full Senate debate.

Crispin Thurlow, a sociolinguist and associate professor of language and communication at the University of Washington-Bothell, said the project was admirable.

He said that as language evolves, such efforts are more than symbolic.

"Changing words can change what we think about the world around us," he said. "These tiny moments accrue and become big movements."

Clark and former councilmember Jan Drago _ the Seattle City Council has long eschewed the terms councilwoman or councilman _ brought the issue to Sen. Jeannie Kohl-Welles in 2006 after they came across references to firemen and policemen in the mayor's proposed budget, as well as in state law dealing with local-government pensions.

Clark and Drago's findings sparked the initial gender-neutral language law that was passed in 2007, immediately changing those terms and directing the state code reviser's office to do a full revision of the rest of the code. A 1983 Washington state law had already required all new statutes to be written in gender-neutral terms, so state officials were tasked with going through the rest of state statutes dating back to 1854 to revise the rest.

As in past bills on the issue that have tackled sections of the state code, some revisions were as simple as adding "or her" after "his." Others required a little more scrutiny. Phrases like "man's past" changes to "humankind's past" and a "prudent man or woman" is simply a "prudent person."

Kyle Thiessen, the state's code reviser who has been working on the project along with two attorneys since 2008, said that the work was not without obstacles.

Words like "manhole" and "manlock" aren't so easily replaced, he said. Substitutes have been suggested _ "utility hole" and "air lock serving as a decompression chamber for workers." But Thiessen said those references will be left alone to avoid confusion.

Republican state Rep. Shelly Short, of Addy, has voted against earlier gender-neutral language bills and said she plans to do the same this year.

"I don't see the need to do gender neutrality," she said, adding that her constituents want her to focus on jobs and the economy. "We're women and we're men."

Kohl-Welles, who has sponsored each of the gender-neutral language bills, said that while this project hasn't been her top legislation every year, "overall, it has important significance."

"I believe," she said, "that the culture has changed."

___

Online:

http:// www.leg.wa.gov

___

Follow Rachel La Corte at http://www.twitter.com/RachelAPOlyor http://www.facebook.com/news.rachel


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
More Local News
Top Stories

  • Back In Business
    A temporary bridge span across the Skagit River is set to open Wednesday

  • What to Eat?
    Woman living on light reveals what her first meal will be after 47 days without food

  • High Altitude Upgrade
    The state's highest outhouse atop Mount Rainier is getting a badly needed upgrade
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (11)


  • Add A Comment

  • adiru wrote...
    I pity
    February 3, 2013 1:28 pm
    the females (can't say "woMEN" who have family names of Nordic origin, such as Johnson and Stevenson and will now be tempted or forced to change it.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • DJFavorite wrote...
    Hey
    February 4, 2013 5:50 am
    Can you use 'females'? It does have the word 'male' in it. :-)
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • R L M 456 wrote...
    What a waste of Legislative Time
    February 3, 2013 1:42 pm
    our tax dollar at work

    pathetic

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • soo purletiv wrote...
    Elections...
    February 3, 2013 2:27 pm
    have consequences...
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Snout wrote...
    Yes, language does evolve.
    February 3, 2013 3:33 pm
    But this is more like engineering the language like some obsessed mad linguist.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • shark75 wrote...
    I'm proud to live in a state
    February 3, 2013 4:56 pm
    Where the most pressing issue for our government is the language in our law code. Amen! Utopia!!.....wait..........
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • BARLOW wrote...
    It's a good thing
    February 3, 2013 4:58 pm
    that we don't have important things to worry about.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Mike Hunt wrote...
    I'm starting to think
    February 3, 2013 5:12 pm
    That this is the most pussified state in the country.

    The elected officials here avoid anything related to fiscal responsibility, but if there's anything PC, they're all over it

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Gunther wrote...
    Budget
    February 4, 2013 1:06 am
    Please, can't we just get a budget completed first? Lets get the real work done before you get to do more social experimenting.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • DJFavorite wrote...
    what a waste of taxpayer money
    February 4, 2013 4:58 am
    Freshmen will always be 'Freshmen'. And from the article, they won't even get it right on other words. 'Phrases like "man's past" changes to "humankind's past.' The word 'human' has 'MAN' in it. That alone shows how a ridiculous waste of money and intelligence (oh I forgot that doesn't exist in Olympia) this effort is.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • shark75 wrote...
    @longwayhome
    February 4, 2013 9:44 am
    You are a brainwashed idiot uncapable of free thought.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }