Wash. lawmakers adjourn, end grueling yearJune 29, 2013 @ 8:03 pm
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Washington lawmakers adjourned for the year Saturday, bringing an end to a grueling six months of work that included two overtime sessions needed to resolve budget disputes.
The Legislature moved to disperse from Olympia on Saturday evening, a day after completing a new operating budget that had been the product of tense negotiations for weeks. The final hours included more combative talks about a transportation funding package that failed to get a vote in the state Senate.
This year's gridlock in the Capitol led lawmakers to blow past their initial April 28 deadline, and they needed two additional sessions to complete the work. State workers had been notified of a potential government shutdown, but Gov. Jay Inslee is expected to formally sign a budget Sunday to prevent that from happening.
It's been more than 20 years since a budget was finished so late in the process.
Lawmakers grappled throughout the year with how to bridge the wide philosophical differences between a Republican-dominated majority in the Senate and a House chamber controlled by Democrats. The House had proposed some $1 billion in new revenue this year in order to help put more money into the education system. The Senate balked at the tax plans and countered with a variety of policy proposals that irked Democrats.
"At the close of this legislative session, we can say that we have been able to do some good things for Washingtonians under tough circumstances," Gov. Jay Inslee said at a news conference following adjournment. "With divided government, and while we're still recovering from the recession, we've been able to begin turning the direction of our state."
He cited several measures as victories, including $1 billion in funding toward education, new rules to strengthen scrutiny of repeat DUI offenders and passage a construction budget that includes money for the start of a long-term effort to help manage water in the Yakima River Basin.
But he was clearly angry over the final dispute that came to a culmination Saturday afternoon, when the Senate declined to take up a $10 billion transportation package despite intense lobbying from himself and business groups.
"For six months we have heard nothing from the Senate majority coalition about transportation except to say no," Inslee said. "This was supposed to be a bipartisan majority, but it has turned into nothing but a roadblock to a transportation package. Inaction is not a solution."
Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom said he and his colleagues were unified in their opposition to the plan this session. They plan to work over the coming months to help develop a proposal that lawmakers could consider next year, Tom said.
"We're going to lead on this issue," said Tom, a Democrat from Medina who leads a majority dominated by Republicans.
Tom said improved infrastructure is important for the state's economic vitality but that lawmakers first need to address policy changes for transportation projects, such as a new approach to the environmental review process. He also said the list of projects funded by the package would need to be focused more on improving congestion.
Senate Democrats made a last-ditch effort to pull the package to the floor for a vote through a procedural move but were unable to get the votes needed to succeed.
Sen. Tracey Eide, a Democrat from Federal Way who is co-chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said the package was the product of months of intense work. She also said she had given her colleagues across the aisle differing offers but didn't receive anything in return.
"I'm just extremely disappointed," Eide said.
The failure of the plan came despite pressure from Inslee, who had hoped the bill would be approved this weekend. Business leaders, who have often been aligned with this year's Senate majority, had also asked for the bill, saying transportation improvements were necessary.
The packaged, which had earlier been approved by the House, would have included a 10 1/2-cent increase in the gas tax in order to pay for a series of large projects, including State Route 167, the North Spokane Corridor, Interstate 90 over Snoqualmie Pass and a replacement bridge over the Columbia River into Oregon.
That Columbia River bridge was widely opposed by Republicans in the state Senate, who said the current proposal for the bridge was too low and should not include light rail transit. They also expressed concern about the costs.
Supporters said it was time to approve that bridge. Oregon and Washington are each responsible for $450 million of the replacement span, with the federal government and toll revenue paying the rest. Oregon has already approved its portion, and officials have expressed concern that federal money provided for the project will fall through if Washington state fails to act.
"Washington has lost $850 million in federal funds that would have helped us build a new I-5 bridge across the Columbia River," Inslee wrote in an earlier statement.
(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Flight of Her Life
Julie Spencer went from her father's funeral to the state championship in the same day
Inspections reveal surprising number of cracks and movement on Seattle's viaduct
A Tacoma furniture store writes the checks for Percy Harvin's Super Bowl kick return
Please login below with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing MyNorthwest account holders will need to create a new Disqus account or use one of the social logins provided below. Thank you.