West Coast officials discuss oil transportationSeptember 25, 2013 @ 3:27 pm
SEATTLE (AP) - Environmental regulators from the Northwest deliberated Wednesday about the dramatic changes in the way oil and other energy products are carried through the region.
At a task force meeting of West Coast states, Linda Pilkey-Jarvis of the Washington Department of Ecology described the sudden increase in oil trains coming into the state and traveling along the Columbia River. She said oil-spill response resources have typically focused on tanker traffic off the coast or pipeline routes, so the new transport strategies will require new tactics, new technologies and new personnel around inland water resources.
"We have quite a lot of work today as we start shifting our focus inland," Pilkey-Jarvis said.
Meanwhile, officials from British Columbia described how a proposed expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline and other ways of moving crude oil could lead to an increase in tanker traffic along the province's west coast and in water bodies close to Washington and Alaska. That increased traffic will also bring increased risk, officials said.
"There's big, big developments going on in British Columbia, and those developments are going to impact neighboring states," said D'Arcy Sego, emergency planning analyst at the Ministry of Environment in British Columbia.
Industry officials also attended a conference that was part of the task force meeting. They touted the safety of the transportation methods and the environmental oversight.
Several West Coast governments _ Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, California and Hawaii _ have been involved in the conversations. The goal has been to give states a place to share ideas and information about oil spill prevention and mitigation.
The issue of oil trains isn't isolated to the region, but it has challenged officials typically used to preparing for oil shipments in other ways. Looming over that discussion has been the disaster in Quebec in July in which an unattended train rolled away and derailed in the town of Lac-Megantic near the Maine border, triggering explosions, the destruction of the town's center and the deaths of 47 people.
Patrick Brady of BNSF Railway said the Quebec disaster was an anomaly. He touted company stats showing very few numbers of accidents or spills and contended that moving hazardous materials by rail is 16 times safer than on roads.
In the first half of this year, U.S. railroads moved 178,000 carloads of crude oil. That's double the number during the same period last year and 33 times more than during the same period in 2009.
Much of that increase is from oil produced in the Bakken oil patch in North Dakota and surrounding areas. The train that crashed in Quebec was carrying oil from North Dakota to a refinery in New Brunswick, Canada.
(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
'Intentional & Dishonest'
Jason Rantz asks, why is SDOT minimizing the number of drivers coming into Seattle?
Dam Difficult Decision
November is the wettest month & that means flooding could be just days or weeks away
Please login below with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing MyNorthwest account holders will need to create a new Disqus account or use one of the social logins provided below. Thank you.