Obama urged to make economy a bigger, bolder topic


FILE - In this Aug. 11, 2009, file photo Senior White House Adviser David Axelrod, left, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, right, leave with President Barack Obama, not shown, from the White House in Washington. Obama allies and former top aides are worried he has lost his voice on his central theme of economic opportunity, silenced by a trio of recent troubles. Axelrod and Gibbs are pressing Obama's current aides to let the president stake out a big vision once again, not only to put a focus on his second term but to move away from the controversies engulfing the White House. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File) | Zoom

WASHINGTON (AP) - Five months into President Barack Obama's second term, allies and former top aides worry that his overarching goal of economic opportunity has been diminished, partly drowned out by controversies seized upon by Republicans in an effort to weaken him.

The former White House insiders, including longtime Obama adviser David Axelrod, say Obama needs to make his case anew for government's role in expanding education and innovation and to give, as Obama put it in one of his early seminal speeches, "every American a fighting chance in the 21st century."

Among their suggestions is that the president deliver a major address, perhaps at a commencement, that once again places his economic vision at the center of his agenda and speaks to what continues to be the overriding concern of the American public.

Instead, absent major legislative victories, Obama's second term has become a series of small actions overshadowed by a trio of recent troubles over the administration's response to the attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, the IRS's targeting of conservative groups and the Justice Department's seizure of Associated Press phone records as part of a leak investigation.

"The hardest thing in the hot house of Washington in weeks like this is to get above the maelstrom and really define major issues in your own terms," Axelrod said. "They need to find big platforms, whether it's congressional addresses, commencement speeches, high-profile interviews or a combination of those things and others."

As these Democrats see it, there has been an arc of Obama addresses that have spelled out the challenge and the hope of attaining the American Dream, from a 2005 commencement address at tiny Knox College in Galesburg, Ill., to his speech in Osawatomie, Kan., in late 2011, and that the time for another one is now.

Over the last two weeks, Obama has been trying to draw attention to his job-creation ideas with small events in Austin and, on Friday, in Baltimore. The daytime visits have been coupled with modest executive initiatives that tend to garner local media attention but get lost in Washington's attention to the contentious issues of the moment.

"There does seem to be a risk of getting bogged down in noise," said Jared Bernstein, who was part of Obama's economic team when he served as Vice President Joe Biden's chief economist. "He doesn't need to get out to talk about Benghazi and the IRS and the budget deficit. He needs to talk about investment in the nation's productivity."

Obama has called for more government spending on education, public works projects, and research and development and has proposed paying for it largely with higher taxes. But after letting one tax increase on the rich pass at the beginning of the year, Republicans have steadfastly refused any further tax hikes and have resisted Obama's spending plans. The result has been a fruitless search, at least so far, for a "grand bargain" to trim the nation's long-term debt.

In the face of Republican-led investigations in Congress and with some conservatives even suggesting impeachment proceedings against the president, some Obama advisers say that boldly elevating the economy would create a sharp contrast and emphasize their belief that Republicans are overplaying their hand. They note that as dissatisfaction with Washington has grown, Obama has continued to hold a substantial edge over the Republicans in Congress.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said that creating jobs is the top priority of Republicans, too, but "we're also focused on holding this administration accountable" about what happened in Libya and with the IRS.

If Obama has a single long-term governing priority, it is a deep-seated belief that advances in technology and globalization have translated into a significant consumer benefits but have also eroded middle-class gains. "The result has been the emergence of what some call a `winner take all' economy, in which a rising tide doesn't necessarily lift all boats," he wrote in his 2006 book, "The Audacity of Hope."

The opportunity to make a broad shift toward the economy might have presented itself this week, when the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted that the budget deficit for 2013 will be $642 billion _ lower than estimated and half of the record $1.4 trillion hit during Obama's first year in office. Instead, that bit of news was overshadowed by the IRS, Benghazi and AP phone record controversies.

Armed with a lower deficit number, some of Obama's liberal critics say he should abandon efforts to reduce deficits and focus exclusively on jobs.

"They should declare victory," said Lawrence Mishel, president and CEO of the liberal Economic Policy Institute. "Making the big policy and political project the grand bargain has been digging us in a deeper and deeper hole."

White House officials say the time to pause and deliver the type of major address that connects Obama's policies to his core beliefs is when it has the possibility of making a major impact. For now, they say, their economic tour across the country is better suited to the moment.

"What we think that these tours do is add another dimension to the argument of what we're trying to get done with Congress," White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri said. "That this is not just about budgets, this is about steps that Congress can take legislatively and the president can take unilaterally that will create jobs and help middle-class families."

How to emphasize Obama's jobs agenda was a subject Thursday during a meeting between top White House aides and outside Democratic operatives, many of whom had worked for Bill Clinton's administration. They had been called by Obama chief of staff Denis McDonough to consult and offer ideas on how to respond to the most recent uproars. Among those attending were such Clinton aides as Paul Begala and Mike McCurry.

"What the president can do is make decisions about what he wants to talk to the American people about," said Democratic consultant Tad Devine, who also attended Thursday's meeting. "And my view is, as someone who spends time sitting in focus groups listening to voters, what's at the top of mind with them is the economy still."

___

Follow Jim Kuhnhenn on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Top Stories
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (11)


  • Add A Comment

  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    Aahahahahahahahahaaa!
    Wait, first is was "Bush's fault". Now it's a storm's. Yeah, couldn't be anything to do with the incompetent, unqualified lying communist in the Oval Office. NO! It's the storm...yeah, that's the ticket! Pathetic. This guys is such a narcissist that he's only responsible for the good stuff. The farked up stuff; ain't my fault!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Fuego wrote...
    What ?
    I thought the economy is doing fine. I mean if BO said it last fall then why isn't it true? I guess my glass of cool-aid has run dry.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SickofSeattleite wrote...
    "The gloomy old problem of a sluggish economy"
    You mean the one Obama spent hundreds of billions on to stimulate that did not work? How do you expect an economy to flourish when it is buried in a sea of debt? How do you expect people to survive when they are buried in a sea of regulations, laws and taxes that their own lawmakers do not obey? How come their are consequences for the people of this country but not the rulers who have hijacked our once great county. The Obama administration and all the fools running the show are destroying families and business nationwide....60% approval rating is a LIE! STOP SPENDING! CUT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS! CUT WELFARE!!! CUT GOVT GROWTH!!!! This is common sense. It is a sad day when Canada is talking about how embarrassing America's debt and social programs are....
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • hnuh wrote...
    He who owns the information
    owns the present. The nonfeasance of the traditional media causes the 0bama administration to own most of the information the politically casual public receives. The casual consumer of this information believes it because the sources are trusted. The betrayal of the public's trust by traditional media allows the comprehensively destructive policies of the 0bama/liberation theology/socialist/communist/social justice/racialist/state totalitarian/banana republic/tin pot dictatorship ideology to proceed at their leisure. He who owns the present has a strong claim to own the future, not to mention the past, by the way.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    Wait a cotton pickin' minute!
    You mean you can't "spend & borrow your way to prosperity" after all? And nothing from the commie "brain-trust"? hello? Assiah? CH? wrongway? HEEEELLLO???
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Cbrew wrote...
    Why don't conservatives take responsibility for their party?
    You guys are sitting here putting all the blame on President Obama and completely letting your own party off the hook for it's guilty actions in the economic picture of America... President Obama hasn't changed the economy enough to warrant praise obviously... But the recession occurred under Bush's Presidency and aside from 2 years of Obama's administration, Republicans have had power in at least the house... Where's your outrage at your own congress? They are the ones that create and pass budgets... why on Earth do you let your own party off the hook... the entire political system is to blame for where we are and for the fact that they're too busy bickering to actually come up with a sensible budget plan for the US... pinning it on Obama is just being stupid and petty.... the 2 party's share the full burden of blame and if you see it any other way, you're lying to yourself to try and feel better about your political affilliation and furthermore, you're completely stupid.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • hnuh wrote...
    03-18-2013.... @Cbrew...
    Liberal/leftist policies have created the problem (not Republican/Democrat, currently all Democrat leadership is leftist, and much of the Republican leadership is as well, a neo-con is usually a leftist/fascist in disguise) The gradual infusion throughout our system of socialistic/communistic ideas... to wit: "government is master of all and all things"..."those who do must support those who do not do"... "economic equality is the greatest good"... "your earnings are not yours by right but at the whim of government"... and very many more sick and wrong social and economic ideas... have caused the destruction of the fundamentals of American prosperity. So just to be real, it is not a party problem since both are poisoned. It is an ideology problem, leftist ideology is ultimately a vicious, self dealing lie. Look at Europe for a view of our future if(as) we continue on this miserable, perverted and stupid course.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SickofSeattleite wrote...
    Wow! This is biased...Obama has pulled us past the brink into recovery?
    Not from where i am looking! Things are worse! all my neighbors are unemployed for 2 years or longer...one of them is on disability for a disability he does not have...most my neighbors get some kind of handout...medical, ebt, unemployment they did not earn....Crime is WAY UP!!!!! Houses are vacant and deteriorating. How are we past the brink into better? More like past the brink falling in slow motion over the cliff the obama administration has created with their ineptocracy! I will believe what i am seeing and experiencing and not what the media tells me to!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • murr wrote...
    Looking for his next position
    After being the biggest cliff leader.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SickofSeattleite wrote...
    Everything Obama does
    puts a drag on the economy...the only one exempt is the ruling class aka the royal politicians running the show. It's not about Americans anymore.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }