Obama taking action on gun background check system


President Barack Obama, next to Vice President Joe Biden, gestures as he speaks during a news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House, in Washington, on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, about the defeat in the Senate of a bill to expand background checks on guns. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) | Zoom

WASHINGTON (AP) - Blocked by Congress from expanding gun sale background checks, President Barack Obama is turning to actions within his own power to keep people from buying a gun who are prohibited for mental health reasons.

Federal law bans certain mentally ill people from purchasing firearms, but not all states are providing data to stop the prohibited sales to the FBI's background check system. A federal review last year found 17 states contributed fewer than 10 mental health records to the database, meaning many deemed by a judge to be a danger still could have access to guns.

The Obama administration was starting a process Friday aimed at removing barriers in health privacy laws that prevent some states from reporting information to the background check system. The action comes two days after the Senate rejected a measure that would have required buyers of firearms online and at gun shows to pass a background check. That's already required for shoppers at licensed gun dealers.

Stung by the defeat, Obama vowed to keep up the fight for the background check expansion but also to do what he could through executive action.

"Even without Congress, my administration will keep doing everything it can to protect more of our communities," Obama said from the Rose Garden shortly after the Senate voted. "We're going to address the barriers that prevent states from participating in the existing background check system."

Obama also mentioned giving law enforcement more information about lost and stolen guns and establishing emergency plans for schools. Those measures were among the 23 executive actions the president signed in January when he announced his broader push for tighter gun laws in response to a mass shooting of first-graders and staff at Newtown, Conn.'s Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The Health and Human Services Department on Friday was beginning to ask for public comment on how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, passed by Congress in 1996 and known as HIPAA, is preventing some states from reporting to the background check system and how to address the problem. Under HIPAA, health care providers such as hospitals may release limited information to police, but only in certain circumstances such as when a court is involved.

Since 1968, federal law has banned the sale of guns to those who have been deemed a danger to themselves or others, involuntarily committed or judged not guilty by reason of insanity or incompetent to stand trial. The background check system _ which is also used to prevent convicted felons from buying guns _ was established under the 1993 Brady Bill.

A few state agencies shared mental health records voluntarily for years, but the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007 spurred passage of legislation that required states to submit the records or eventually risk losing up to 5 percent of the federal funding they receive to fight crime.

Last year's review by the Government Accountability Office found that although the number of mental health records available to the background check system increased 800 percent since 2004, some states said they were not sharing mental health information because of concerns about restrictions under HIPAA privacy law. Obama is interested in a change that would specifically allow disclosure of mental health records for the system, and he wants to increase financial incentives for states to contribute the information.

In the Virginia Tech rampage, student Seung-Hui Cho shot 32 people to death and committed suicide. He was able to buy two guns even though he had been ruled a danger to himself during a court hearing in 2005 and was ordered to undergo outpatient mental health treatment.

Authorities have not described a possible motive or released details of any mental health condition that might explain why Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza killed 20 children and six adults before killing himself. The rifle he used was purchased by his mother, whom he also killed at home before heading to the school.

The background check system does not give retailers access to mental health records but simply tells them whether a buyer is approved, denied or needs additional investigation before a firearm may be purchased. The system doesn't tell the seller why a potential buyer was denied.

___

Follow Nedra Pickler on Twitter: https://twitter.com/nedrapickler


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Top Stories
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (122)


  • Add A Comment

  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    The final result will be more votes for The Dems.
    You keep thinking this way WSU. Just makes it that much easier for the rest of us!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    Report:
    GOP Will End Fast And Furious Investigation !! Dear Speaker Boehner: On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the undersigned organizations, we write in response to a May 21, 2012 report in Politico that the House of Representatives will vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress if he fails to provide additional information related to the “Fast and Furious” program. We are deeply troubled by the prospect that the Attorney General will be cited for contempt by the House, and believe that such action is unwarranted. We urge you to reconsider that decision. While we believe that a review of the Fast and Furious program is a legitimate exercise of congressional authority, we are concerned that the tenor and approach you are reportedly taking does a disservice to Congress, the Attorney General’s office, and the public, and may also be a partisan attempt to discredit the Attorney General. The Attorney General has acknowledged problems and flaws in the Fast and Furious program. According to reports, the Attorney General and the Department of Justice have submitted more than 7000 pages of document to Congress, and the Attorney General has appeared before Congress on this issue a reported seven times. The Department has also reportedly made several senior officials available for testimony, interviews, and briefings. In addition, the Attorney General has ordered the Inspector General to investigate and has provided him with tens of thousands of additional documents—documents that would be inappropriate to turn over to Congress, because they reportedly include law enforcement information, grand jury transcripts, and other information that would compromise ongoing investigations and prosecutions. To put it simply, the attempt to cite General Holder for contempt seems to be a rush to judgment intended to create a stain on the office of the Attorney General. It is contributing to an environment of accusatory vitriol and malignant suspicion that is both unwarranted and a significant distraction at a time when the Attorney General needs to focus on the nation’s core problems. The harshness of the attacks themselves is misplaced, and to the extent these attacks are intended to divert the Attorney General from the vigorous enforcement of the nation's laws—including those protecting civil rights, voting rights, disability rights, and other core concerns—we are deeply troubled. We are concerned that the contempt threat is intended to create a hostile environment aimed at pressuring the Attorney General to resign. This development is particularly disturbing because of the exemplary job the Attorney General has done in enforcing the nation’s civil rights laws. The constituencies that we represent are eager to see our leaders focus on job creation, the continued reinvigoration of our economy, and the rooting out of waste, fraud and abuse. We urge you to reconsider this course of action. Thank you for your consideration.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    Americans have NO reason to fear this Obamunist Government and it's attacks on our US Constitution and Second Amendment?

    Read this if you are not afraid of the truth of your beloved regime!

    In a White House press conference today, President Obama indicated he would use executive orders in come cases to pass through gun control measures. He did not specify what those orders might be and was quite vague on how he would go about it and determine exactly what he claims to have authority over, but it certainly will be interesting in the next few days to see what he comes up with. And let's hope Congress responds to any executive order that oversteps the President's authority and undermines the Constitution by telling Barack Obama, "No Mr President, you don't have that authority." Read some of the transcript of what the President had to say and watch the video below to hear Obama try and explain himself: "My understanding is the vice president's going to provide a range of steps that we can take to reduce gun violence, some of them will require legislation, some of them I can accomplish through executive action. And so I will be reviewing those today, and as I said, I will speak in more detail to what we're going to go ahead and propose later in the week. But I'm confident that there are some steps that we can take that don't require legislation and that are within my authority as president, and where you get a step that, has the opportunity to reduce the possibility of gun violence, then I want to go ahead and take it."

    Elections have consequences. These consequences go far beyond Guns!

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • cigarfan wrote...
    @Lord Ha ha!
    Please cite your source.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    http://www.isthatbaloney.com/obama-claims-to-have-executive-authority-over-guns/
    Huh! I usually always do. Must be gettin old!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Cbrew wrote...
    Gun Control will not pass, if it does, it will not last
    Though I support much of what President Obama stands for, I am absolutely opposed to Gun Control. They're trying to act like Violence is caused by the instrument and not the attacker, It's the wrong way to go after this problem. You know, a car can kill many people too, crazy people don't get to drive around because people know to prevent them from driving... for some reason they don't keep guns out of their reach and suddenly it's the guns fault? Take some responsibility... Guns don't kill people if guns kill people then it's the spoon and fork's fault for making people fat... Should we ban forks and spoons for the obesity problems in this country? Government needs to know it's place, and it's place is to protect our rights not limit them. Besides, Gun control should be the LEAST of our worries right now... Fix the economy idiots... and for crying out loud can the Republicons do their bloody job and quit pushing our country over the cliff? Costs me 150 a month because speaker Bohner and his Republican't buddies refused to budge until AFTER we crossed the line... What a JOKE!!! REPUBLICANS ARE A JOKE!!!! You want to fix our economy and don't want new taxes... so you Push the country over the fiscal cliff putting more taxes on EVERYBODY???? HOW DID YOU HELP US YOU IDIOTS!!!! .... There better not be a single Republican left in the house in 2 years... this party is done.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Cbrew
    With exception to your pathetic and totally ridiculous attack on anyone to the right of your shallow, narrow minded and laughably ill- informed opinion, I totally agree with you on the gun control issue.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    Costs me 150 a month because speaker Bohner and his Republican't buddies refused to budge until AFTER we crossed the line... What a JOKE!!! REPUBLICANS ARE A JOKE!!!! You want to fix our economy and don't want new taxes... so you Push the country over the
    nicely said Cbrew
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    Cbrew
    The first half of your post totally blew me away. That looked like one of my posts. I was impressed.

    Sadly enough the second half of your post brought me back to reality. It is a spending problem caused by the regime. Not a lack of taxes. No amount of taxation will pay for Obama's wildly out of control socialist spending. Not anything the Republicans have done either. Other than to have every spending bill rejected by the Reed Liberal dominated Senate. It was your Dear Leader who refused to budge. Unfortunatly the Republicans in this fiscal cliff did budge and now we have Obama's long promised tax increases.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    Am listening to more thorough background checks.
    Will want to hear the Dear Leaders proposals as long as they are intended to ween out mentally ill people from having guns.

    Instant background checks I don't see an issue with this!

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    While the focus is on the Dear Leader attempting to abolish the Second Amendment providing cover,,
    what other subterfuge is your regime up to?

    The regimes mantra of, "Never let a crisis go to waist" is living up to it's promise.

    Parrots, you immaculated your Dear Leader for four more years, what is your beloved Obama up to now?

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    But the democrat party is the greatest, greediest, most corrupt, criminal enterprise in the history of our once great republic -
    for Christ sake bill put down the bottle. Your getting the parties mixed up!! Go sleep it off!!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • murr wrote...
    Its takes an idiot
    To raze the 2nd amendment
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }