White House seeks 'balanced way' to budget fix


In this Sunday, Feb. 17, 2013, file photo provided by CBS News new White House Chief or Staff Denis McDonough speaks on CBS's "Face the Nation" in Washington. On talk shows Sunday McDonough said Obama is concerned about the effect the automatic budget cuts, scheduled for next month, will have on America's middle class. He said the economy has been getting stronger over the past few months, and cited improvements in housing, the stock market and consumer confidence. McDonough also said the White House will push for what he calls a reasonable amount of spending cuts coupled with additional tax revenue. (AP Photo/CBS News,Chris Usher) | Zoom

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama is concerned about the effect that looming, drastic across-the-board budget cuts will have on the middle class, his new chief of staff said Sunday. Congressional Republicans predicted the cuts would start as scheduled next month and blamed Obama not only for doing little to stop them but for the idea itself.

The cuts, called the sequester, would drain $85 billion from the government's budget over the coming seven months. Actual cuts may be around 13 percent for defense and 9 percent for other programs because lawmakers delayed their impact, requiring savings over a shorter period of time. The White House last week let loose a list of ways Americans would feel the trims, from longer waits at airport security to as many as 13,000 teachers being laid off. Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told a congressional panel the sequester would hollow the U.S. military because it would give the Pentagon little leeway in deciding how best to spend the money.

Denis McDonough, the president's chief of staff, warned the cuts would come as the stock market is coming back, the housing market has improved and the number of jobs has grown, and urged Congress to consider a balanced approach that would further strengthen the economy and, in turn, the middle class.

"This isn't a spending fight for us," McDonough told NBC's "Meet the Press." "This is a fight about whether we're going to make the investments in middle class families in this country, in education, in science and technology, in food inspection, and those kinds of things."

Senate Democrats last week offered a plan they say is a balanced approach of more revenue and budget cuts. The White House supports the proposal, but it drew an icy reception from Republicans, who say the president got the tax increases he wanted during the agreement to avoid the "fiscal cliff."

"The question isn't whether we're going to insist on some position because that's the ideologically right position," McDonough said. "This should not be a social science experiment. This should be a question where we ask ourselves, what is most important to the economy, what is most important to the middle class families of this country, and that's the way the president is going to do this."

South Carolina's Sen. Lindsay Graham was among the Republicans on Sunday who recalled the president's position on the sequester in the fall.

"The president promised in the campaign sequestration would not happen. Now, he is allowing it to happen," Graham said on "Fox News Sunday."

"He's the commander-in-chief and on his watch, we're going to begin to unravel the finest military in the history of the world, at a time when we need it most," Graham, a member of the Armed Services Committee added. "If you want to look at ways to find $1.2 trillion in savings over the next decade, let's look at Obamacare. Let's don't destroy the military and just cut blindly across the board. There are many ways to do this."

However, Graham offered no specifics.

The Democrats propose generating revenue from plugging some tax loopholes. Those include tax breaks for the oil and gas industry and businesses that have sent jobs overseas and taxing millionaires at a rate of at least 30 percent.

Rep. Paul Ryan, who chairs the Budget Committee, advocates for plugging loopholes, but as part of a discussion on tax reform, not sequestration.

"Loopholes are necessary for tax reform," Ryan said on ABC's "This Week." "If you take them for spending, you're blocking tax reform and you're really not getting the deficit under control."

With the March 1 deadline fast approaching, Sen. Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat and close ally of the White House, predicted that Republicans will eventually join Democrats to avoid the cuts.

"They have no choice," Schumer said on CNN's "State of the Union." "Their arguments are untenable and don't meet the favor of hardly anyone other than themselves and the special interests they're protecting."


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Top Stories

  • Otherworldly
    Amazon has new plans for huge biospheres on its new campus

  • One
    Microsoft calls its new Xbox 'truly intelligent TV'

  • Skillet Spreads
    Seattle's Skillet Street Food and its creator are growing way beyond the Airstream
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (13)


  • Add A Comment

  • CH wrote...
    do it circus clowns
    and you will be gone.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    House is controlled by Republicans
    that is the problem Republicans. Republicans will be gone 2014 then We Americans can get things done. You will see!!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Get it done?
    You mean let the Democrats bankrupt the country? Obama wants to keep on spending. Hasn't worked so far, but that's the stupidity and insanity of Democrats. Keep doing the same thing over & over expecting a different result. $5 TRILION tax dollars spent =ZERO JOB Creation or economic growth. Yeah, blame the Republicans....BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HLC wrote...
    CH your so funny.
    Do you even identify with any thing american. You are a pure socialist like your dear leader. Face up to it and quit calling yourself an american. Your just being silly.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • calapete wrote...
    the majority of Americans want the House to represent the middle class
    But Boehner only takes orders from lobbyists. It pays better.

    This is going to be a disaster for the GOP. I can't wait to watch.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • cigarfan wrote...
    Boenhner is approaching sobriety.............
    Although his corporate masters won't be happy if the BLOATED pentagon budget gets cut. Good thing Obama doesn't have to run for office again and can help low wage workers instead of corporate lobbyists. ;)
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Rangerhawk wrote...
    Only thing missing above is the snare drum/cymbal crash & laugh-track
    How about let's scramble that into reality speak: White House needs balanced budget as way to fix America?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SickofSeattleite wrote...
    theres nothing balanced when you spend more money than you bring in
    normally this would lead to bankruptcy and foreclosure....apparently our own government does not play by the same rules they govern us by.....balanced would be cutting cutting cutting not spending spending spending....this is all basic math common sense and a little thing i like to call logic.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    You mean you can't
    spend and borrow your way to "prosperity"?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Rastafed1971 wrote...
    Balanced?
    Obama thinks a balanced approach means increasing government spending in all areas, not just a couple!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    Just more lies from Owebama
    He has no intent to ever balance a budget.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • sohojo wrote...
    Wait
    until the unaffordable care act is fully implemented in 2014 and watch the economy sprial downward. My prediction is that the unemployment rate will hit 10% by 2015. I hope I am wrong. The democrats will not be able to continue to blame republicans at that point. Obama will own this cluster F.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }