Senate Democratic budget extends standoff with GOP


The setting sun is reflected in the windows of the U.S. Capitol, on Capitol Hill, Friday, March 22, 2013 in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) | Zoom

WASHINGTON (AP) - An exhausted Senate gave pre-dawn approval Saturday to a Democratic $3.7 trillion budget for next year that embraces nearly $1 trillion in tax increases over the coming decade but shelters domestic programs targeted for cuts by House Republicans.

While their victory was by a razor-thin 50-49 vote, it allowed Democrats to tout their priorities. Yet it doesn't resolve the deep differences the two parties have over deficits and the size of government.

Joining all Republicans voting no were four Democrats who face re-election next year in potentially difficult races: Sens. Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina and Mark Pryor of Arkansas. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., did not vote.

White House spokesman Jay Carney praised the Senate plan, saying in a statement it "will create jobs and cut the deficit in a balanced way."

While calling on both sides to find common ground, Carney did not hold out much hope for compromise with Republicans. The rival budget passed by the GOP-led House cuts social programs too deeply, he said, and fails "to ask for a single dime of deficit reduction from closing tax loopholes for the wealthy and well-connected."

The Senate vote came after lawmakers labored through the night on scores of symbolic amendments, ranging from voicing support for letting states collect taxes on Internet sales to expressing opposition to requiring photo IDs for voters.

Final approval came at around 5 a.m. EDT, capping an extraordinary 20 hours of votes and debate. As the night wore on, virtually all senators remained in the chamber, a rarity during a normal business day. But at that hour, most had nowhere else to go.

The Senate's budget would shrink annual federal shortfalls over the next decade to nearly $400 billion, raise unspecified taxes by $975 billion and cull modest savings from domestic programs.

In contrast, a rival budget approved by the GOP-run House balances the budget within 10 years without boosting taxes.

That blueprint_ by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., his party's vice presidential candidate last year _ claims $4 trillion more in savings over the period than Senate Democrats by digging deeply into Medicaid, food stamps and other safety net programs for the needy. It would also transform the Medicare health care program for seniors into a voucher-like system for future recipients.

"We have presented very different visions for how our country should work and who it should work for," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray, D-Wash.

The long debate got testy at times.

As the clock ticked past 1 a.m., Murray asked senators to show respect for colleagues "who may not be able to stand as long as us, or who are elderly." Sen. David Vitter, R-La., shot back that Republicans were not trying to delay anything, and wondered what flights or other appointments would be missed if senators voted until 7 a.m.

The loudest acclaim came toward the end, when senators rose as one to cheer a handful of Senate pages _ high school students _ for their work in the chamber since the morning's opening gavel. Senators then left town for a two-week spring recess.

Congressional budgets are planning documents that leave actual changes in revenues and spending for later legislation, and this was the first the Democratic-run Senate has approved in four years. That lapse is testament to the political and mathematical contortions needed to write fiscal plans in an era of record-breaking deficits, and to the parties' profoundly conflicting views.

Republicans said the Democratic budget wasn't much of an accomplishment. "The only good news is that the fiscal path the Democrats laid out...won't become law," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"I believe we're in denial about the financial condition of our country," Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, top Republican on the Budget panel, said of Democratic efforts to boost spending on some programs. "Trust me, we've got to have some spending reductions."

Though budget shortfalls have shown signs of easing slightly and temporarily, there is no easy path for the two parties to find compromise _ which the first months of 2013 have amply illustrated.

Already this year, Congress has raised taxes on the rich after narrowly averting tax boosts on virtually everyone else, tolerated $85 billion in automatic spending cuts, temporarily sidestepped a federal default and prevented a potential government shutdown.

By sometime this summer, the government's borrowing limit will have to be extended again _ or a default will be at risk _ and it is unclear what Republicans may demand for providing needed votes. It is also uncertain how the two parties will resolve the differences between their two budgets, something many believe simply won't happen.

Both sides have expressed a desire to reduce federal deficits. But President Barack Obama is demanding a combination of tax increases and spending cuts to do so, while GOP leaders say they won't consider higher revenues but want serious reductions in Medicare and other benefit programs that have rocketed deficits skyward.

Obama plans to release his own 2014 budget next month, an unveiling that will be studied for whether it signals a willingness to engage Republicans in negotiations or play political hardball.

The amendments senators considered during their long day of debate were all nonbinding, but some delivered potent political messages.

They voted in favor of giving states more powers to collect sales taxes on online purchases their citizens make from out-of-state Internet companies, and to endorse the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that is to pump oil from Canada to Texas refineries.

They also voiced support for eliminating the $2,500 annual cap on flexible spending account contributions imposed by Obama's health care overhaul and for charging regular postal rates for mailings by political parties, which currently qualify for the lower prices paid by nonprofits.

In a rebuke to one of the Senate's most conservative members, they overwhelmingly rejected a proposal by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., to cut even deeper than the House GOP budget and eliminate deficits in just five years.

The Democratic budget's $975 billion in new taxes would be matched by an equal amount of spending reductions coming chiefly from health programs, defense and reduced interest payments as deficits get smaller than previously anticipated.

This year's projected deficit of nearly $900 billion would fall to around $700 billion next year and bottom out near $400 billion in 2016 before trending upward again.

Shoehorned into the package is $100 billion for public works projects and other programs aimed at creating jobs.

__

Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

___

Follow Alan Fram on Twitter: https://twitter.com/asfram


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Top Stories

  • Devastation
    Oklahoma City tornado kills at least 50, dozens of kids missing

  • Twister Terror
    Gallery: Deadly Oklahoma tornado

  • Messiest
    New lane restrictions mean Mercer Street is tough to travel during afternoon commutes
MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (94)


  • Add A Comment

  • longwayhome wrote...
    maplecarp and hpd's
    Heads are up the poop chute. Can't see cause it's too dark? You two are worse than it's me any day, with your republican stupidity. Remember, you lost? Why is that? Explain to the rest of us on this news site why you guys STILL think Obama is on the wrong track. Try to use your own words, don't go to faux news for some obscure clips from your favorite limbaugh quotes, just some common sense reason why you guys think you are right and the Democrats are wrong. I'm not going to hold my breath for any sensible response, probably just some more name calling and vague answers. I'll start it out by calling on hpd to post ONE solution to the problems of the country, without his usual negative input.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Again...DUMBSHIIT Wrongway -
    Read this, learn and PISS OFF: www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyLmru6no4U
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    wronway....You are a child....
    .....
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    just some common sense reason why you guys think you are right and the Democrats are wrong.
    I can provide sixteen TRILLION reasons (and growing) why he and you are wrong and each one has a picture of Washington on them. But then you have no commons sense and obviously cannot grasp economics or basic math.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • bigdogina4x4 wrote...
    Longway...seriously her is the list:
    1. We can't spend more than we take in. The money we take in is Taxes, and many Americans are taxed out and finding it hard to buy groceries and such. So, Obama needs to trim spending. 2. Obama is a poor leader. One example is during the Sequester fight, congress gave him an option to be selective in the spending cuts, but he didn;t have the chops for it abnd refused. Why would he not want to be able to be selective? 3. He tries to manipulate the public with fear. Remember all the horrific things that were going to happen when the sequester set in, the lines, hungry children, a defensless nation.... Guess what, after it happened - he says quote "it's not going to be the apocolypse". Why did he try to make it sound like it was. 4. What about Begazi, we're still not sure why that happened.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • longwayhome wrote...
    Waiting..........
    .......
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • longwayhome wrote...
    When happy hour
    Is at noon, most republican posters are not available at this late hour.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Wrongway
    Your Messiah Obama is a PATHETIC, INCOMPETENT, LYING HYPOCRITE, (just like you little man) who's incapable of doing anything but non-stop campaigning and running away from the HUGE eF ING Mess he's created. He is a FRAUD and a FAILURE and in 3 more weeks we'll be trying again NOT TO SHUT the Government down. You are just too stupid to understand the real world. Put on some big-boy apnts and pay attention. Here's a little more info on your pathetic leader: www.humanevents.com/.../a-dimes-worth-of-barack-obama-g...Cached
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    BTW - Dumbshiit WrongWay
    None of the links I posted were from Fox or any Right leaning Media. They were available all over YouTube. Of course your probably to stupid to even navaigate the links to the proper sites. And as for losing? WRONG! I will live better, my children will live better and their children will live better than you will ever imagine, so who's the LOSER? Not me. HAHAHA...I'm retired at 50 and own 3 beautiful homes. I travel constantly and have put 3 children through college with NO HELP from the Government. I pay more in tax every month then you will ever hope to make in a lifetime. Now, go to the links dumbshiit and learn something. There may be a chance for you to get off pubilc assistance someday if you just use your tiny brain...
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    That's cause we are working extra to pay for all you spending.
    ...
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    LONGWAYHOME!
    How is your drive to get me kicked off the boards going for you????????????
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Rangerhawk wrote...
    You can't fix stupid
    And you can't change your vote after November. We made our poop sandwich and now we've got to eat it. Luckily for Libs, they get heat theirs up with green energy.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • bigdogina4x4 wrote...
    awsome!!!
    that's my new favorite saying.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SickofSeattleite wrote...
    Republicans are right! Cut spending alone!
    Obama threatens jobs and security if he can't spend more and tax more....SO BE IT!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    Owebama's latest...
    "...could...might....maybe...possibly" THE SKY IS FALLNG!!!!!! Not. Only the stupid sheeple believe this.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • hnuh wrote...
    02-26-2013... 0bama warns...
    Don't ever expect a leftist to learn anything he doesn't already know. Its like trying to teach a pig to sing, it frustrates you and annoys the pig. (that's why they shriek and scream so much when confronted with facts).
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    You forgot insult.
    That's their fav.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • bigdogina4x4 wrote...
    I'm a conservative guy,
    but I would be willing to listen to you liberal (CH and Longwayhome)folks, if you can explain how spending more than you take in is a good idea?, and presumably you won't be able to do that, so why the best answer is to increase taxes (we already pay alot)?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • bigdogina4x4 wrote...
    Oh Yeah,
    Obama did get his increase in revenue on December 31, 2012 - when Republicans compromised in good faith to avoid the fiscal cliff on Jan 1.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }