University of Washington astronomer finds planet that may be ideal for life
A NASA telescope has discovered two planets that could be ideal for life to flourish. One of the scientists behind that telescope is a University of Washington astronomer.
The distant planets are the best candidates for habitable planets that astronomers have found so far, said William Borucki, the chief scientist for NASA’s Kepler telescope.
“The planet, if it’s at the right atmospheric properties, it might be able to support liquid water on the surface,” UW astronomer Eric Agol told KIRO Radio. He added that one of the planets might have the greenhouse effect, but other models show its clouds might reflect enough light to stay cool.
The discoveries, published online Thursday in the journal Science, mark a milestone in the search for planets where life could exist.
In the past when astronomers found exoplanets _ planets outside our solar system _ they haven’t fit all the criteria that would make them right for life. Many planets aren’t in the habitable zone _ where it’s not too hot and not too cold for liquid water. And until now, the handful of planets astronomers found in that ideal zone, were just too big. Those are likely to be gas balls like Neptune and that’s not suitable for life.
Similarly, the Earth-size planets that had been found weren’t in the right place near their stars, Borucki said.
In the Goldilocks game of looking for other planets like ours, the new discoveries, called Kepler-62-e and Kepler-62-f are just right. And they are fraternal twins. They circle the same star, an orange dwarf, and are next to each other _ closer together than Earth and its neighbor Mars.
The planets are slightly wider than Earth, but not too big. Kepler-62-e is a bit toasty, like a Hawaiian world and Kepler-62-f is a bit nippy, more Alaskan, Borucki said.
“This is the first one where I’m thinking ‘Huh, Kepler-62-f really might have life on it’,” said study co-author David Charbonneau of Harvard. “This is a very important barrier that’s been crossed. Why wouldn’t it have life?”
Both planets are tantalizing. The dozens of researchers who co-authored the study disagree on which one is better suited to life. Lisa Kaltenegger of the Max Planck Institute of Astronomy in Germany likes Kepler-62-3 more because it’s closer to the star and is warmer. She said it is probably “like Washington in May.”
Agol said the planets are so far away, 1,200 light years, it’s going to be hard to infer much from their atmospheres.
“We may be able to see evidence of interactions between these planets, and from that, tease out the masses of the planets so that we can measure their densities,” said Agol.
Pennsylvania State University professor James Kasting, who wasn’t part of the research, called the findings “a big discovery.”
The planets circle a star that is 7 billion years old _ about 2.5 billion years older than our sun.
“If there’s life at all on those planets, it must be very advanced,” said Borucki.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.