Commentary on news, politics, sports, religion, TV and movies
Tom Tangney
Tom on KIRO Radio
Join Tom Tangney and the rest of the Seattle Morning News crew every weekday morning at 5am on KIRO Radio.
About Tom Tangney
By day, you can hear Tom on Seattle's Morning News, and by night, he sits in the dark, making snide comments about what he sees on the silver screen.
Bonneville Seattle is raising funds for the construction of a second Fisher House at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Tacoma and we need your help.
obama_romney.jpg
Unlike the President Obama's somewhat listless performance in the first debate, he was on the offensive for most of the night Tuesday. (AP Photo/file)

Debates go better when both sides show up

See how much better debates go when both sides show up. Unlike the president's somewhat listless performance in the first debate, he was on the offensive for most of the night Tuesday.

The assumption was that the Town Hall setting was going to make it hard for either side to be aggressive, but the president found a way.

Mitt Romney held his own, but Obama probably won this debate on points. Not as decisively as Romney won the first debate, mind you, but still...

In the first debate, you had a series of Democrats complaining the President missed a lot of opportunities against Romney. Last night, it was the Republicans who were saying that about their candidate.

First and foremost was the exchange on Libya, a topic the GOP thought they had the advantage on.

Romney suggested Obama's administration may have misled Americans over what caused the attack at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, last month that killed four Americans, to which Obama had a strong response.

"The day after the attack governor, I stood in the rose garden and I told the American people and the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said we're going to hunt down those who committed this crime," said Obama.

"A few days later, I was there greeting the caskets coming into Andrews Air Force Base and grieving with the families, and the suggestion that anybody in my team, or the Secretary of State, our UN ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we've lost four of our own governor is offensive. That's not what we do. That's not what I do as president, that's not was I do as commander in chief."

There was fire in his eyes, self-righteous anger and indignation.

Then Romney, who looked like he's coming in for the kill, responds:

"I think it's interesting the president just said something which is that on the day after the attack he went into the rose garden and said this was an act of terror, not a spontaneous demonstration," said Romney. "I want to make sure we get that for the record. Because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror."

Obama interjected, "Get the transcript."

"He did in fact sir," said moderator Candy Crowley.

"Can you say that a little louder?" said Obama.

"He did call it an act of terror," said Crowley. "It did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out."

Romney continued, "The administration indicated that this was a reaction to a video and was a spontaneous reaction. It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group."

Romney eventually got to his point but it wasn't as powerful as expected because he got tripped up a little on Obama's language.

Even without Crowley's intervention, Obama's challenge to "Get the transcript" slowed him down a bit.

Things went much better for Romney when a former Obama voter told the president directly that he was disappointed in him. The GOP would like nothing better than to have this election be a referendum on Obama's first term and this voter provided the ideal platform.

The president started off his response by admitting the country had been through a tough for years.

"But four years ago, I told the American people, and I told you, I would cut taxes for middle class families, and I did. I told you I'd cut taxes for small business, and I have. I said that I'd end the war in Iraq, and I did. I said we'd refocus attention on those who actually attacked us on 9/11 and we have gone after al Qaeda's leadership like never before, and Osama bin Laden is dead."

The president continued speaking of health care reform, saving the auto industry, and job progress.

"The commitments I've made, I've kept," said Obama. "Those that I haven't been able to keep, it's not for lack of trying and we're going to get it done in a second term."

Then Romney got his chance and he took full advantage of it.

"I think you know better. I think you know these last four years haven't been as good as the president's just described and that you don't feel like you're confident the next four years are going to be much better either. I can tell you that if you are to elect President Obama, you know what you are going to get. You're going to get a repeat of the last four years. We just can't afford four more years like the last four years."

Romney said Obama said by now we'd have unemployment at 5.4 percent.

"The difference between where it is and 5.4 percent is 9 million Americans without work," said Romney.

"He said he would have by now put forward a plan to reform Medicare and Social Security, because he pointed out they're on the road to bankruptcy, he would reform them, he'd get that done. He hasn't even made a proposal on either one."

Romney said Obama also said he would put out an immigration plan in his first year, but didn't file a plan.

"This is a president who has not been able to do what he said he'd do," said Romney. "The middle class is getting crushed under the policies of a president who does not understand what it takes to get the economy working again."

Results of a CNN poll pick Obama as the winner, but say Romney did better on the issue of the economy.

With just 20 days left until the election, polls show an extremely tight race nationally. While Republicans have made clear gains in recent days, the president leads in several polls of Wisconsin and Ohio. No Republican has won the White House without winning Ohio.

As the debates unfold, early voting is already under way in many states, and the push to bank as many early ballots as possible is in overdrive.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tom Tangney, KIRO Radio Host
Tom Tangney is co-host of KIRO Radio's Seattle's Morning News and resident enthusiast of...everything. He loves books, movies, TV, art, pop culture, politic, sports, and Husky football.

MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (86)


  • Add A Comment

  • sportsguru wrote...
    Oh boy,

    The jack booted neo-con republican party must be desperate,lol. They are out in force on this blog trying to spin Mittens complete destruction by the POTUS last night,lol.

    Somebody pass Mittens a gas x.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • daveismenotyou wrote...
    Not trying to spin anything
    Cbrew is a jerkwad. That is all I am saying.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • sportsguru wrote...
    daveismenotyou

    Why do you feel that way, in reading Cbrew's post, he appears to be only giving his opinion of last nights debate and you talk about him living in his momma's basement and having an obama phone and calling him a jerkwad?

    Is all this hatred because he has a different political view than yours? Conservative keep trying to convince everybody that liberals are the party of hate and divisiveness, but all I hear are conservative name calling and accusing people of being strain on the American economy if they don't agree with their political ideology,lol.

    If Romney could explain his so called 5 point plan effectively and show us how the math (which every think tank says don't add up) and be truthful about what get's cut and who get's the tax break with some broad explanation, I personally would give his plan some consideration. The fact that he has flipped flopped on everything he has ever said in the past and present just don't sit well with me.

    I mean come on, who wants a POTUS who can't stick to his guns and changes opinion based on what the pundits are saying about him?

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Oly80 wrote...
    my favorite...
    sportsguru, is when they attack the moderator by calling her fat.

    they don't see that that automatically makes any talking point they were about repeat off of fox news completely worthless because they already failed the credibility test by name calling.

    FYI- conservatives who name call in your responses. NAME CALLING is for people who don't have any real, valid points to be made that can be backed up with ACTUAL facts! it's a tactic of fools.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    She is a cow
    And a BLATANT Obama Lover...ZERO Credibly = ZERO Respect
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Oly80 wrote...
    thanks for being a shining example of what i just posted about
    name calling maple.

    what else did you learn on fox news today?

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Sean wrote...
    Like Democrats don't do any of that...
    PLEASE! Neither side has the market cornered on politeness and rudeness and all that. Can we talk instead about THINGS THAT MATTER????
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Oly80 wrote...
    fair point, sean...
    rudness exists on both sides, i'll certainly agree with that.

    but, is calling the moderator fat REALLY "something that matters?"

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    President Romney is either ahead or ties in every poll.
    What makes this so significant for the Dear Leader is that all these polls are still using the over-sample of likely useful idiot voters. And if Obama is ahead in any of them, it is useless. It is still a polling disaster for the regime. The numbers just are not there for the Dear Leaders re immaculation! The Dear Leader should have had 20 or more points on Romney. Like the MSM tried so very hard to do. This election should have been over for American two weeks ago. However this is not the case! Is it Parrots? We American taxpayers are done with this! With the question of "Where you better off four years ago than you are today"?, Obama is losing. No amount of poll rigging and Cooked Books numbers will help Obama. He is lost! At the same time they are not counting the independent voters who are still leaving the Obama camp and running to our new POTUS.

    It will be President Romney in a landslide sweet victory over Obama this November!

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • sportsguru wrote...
    It's me! Ha ha!

    You know what's consistent with you jack booted conservative are that if the polls are in your favor, they are to be believed and if they are not in your favor they are made up.

    To a conscientious public who is trying to make an appropriate decision who to vote for, listening to your party makes us voters feel that your party are all wearing foil hat's with antenna's trying to listen for space aliens. Absolutely insane.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Sean wrote...
    I hope you're right....
    but I think you're wrong. We fell for his cr4p once, as we did for Queen Christine, and we may well do it again. At least a slight majority will!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Booger Barnes wrote...
    Best two lines of the debate.
    Romney saying he will create 12 million jobs with his 5 point plan. Then talking over Obama and repeating "government doesn't create jobs, Government doesn't create jobs" Classic!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheSymbolForBoron wrote...
    Romney's Current 5-Point Plan
    1. Never let on how much you like a girl.

    2. Always call the shots.

    3. Act like wherever you are - that’s the place to be.

    4. When ordering food, find out what she wants then order for both of you. It’s a classy move.

    5. When it comes to making out, whenever possible, put on side one of Led Zeppelin IV.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheSymbolForBoron wrote...
    Hey MyNorthwest Webmaster:
    You're not escaping the apostrophes properly.

    Test: '

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheSymbolForBoron wrote...
    Test Again:

    This is the right single quote.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Sean wrote...
    So, Booger....
    Government DOES create jobs? Well, yeah, in this state it sure does. But it's a pipe dream, and a way for the government to build dependency on itself. Government DOES NOT create jobs -- government POLICIES can ENABLE jobs. THAT'S the point.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Mike Hunt wrote...
    @booger
    I missed the debate - but I think you may be combining two different parallel tracks of economics

    It's true that only the private sector creates jobs. The government can only speed this up by cutting taxes/barriers for those businesses, or slow it by doing the opposite

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • calapete wrote...
    etch a sketch!
    wow, that was something else. too bad no one is paying attention. Debate 1. Planned Parenthood, we're going to get rid of that. Debate 2: I’d just note that I don't believe that bureaucrats in Washington should tell someone whether they can use contraceptives or not, and I don't believe employers should tell someone whether they could have contraceptive care or not. Every woman in America should have access to contraceptives. And the President’s statement of my policy is completely and totally wrong.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • spot on wrote...
    Candy's help
    How much would the libs be crying if Candy had stepped in and "fact checked" one of the many statements of our President? Right or wrong that was way beyond what her role was.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • DesertRez wrote...
    Anyways
    To stay on track; I like that Romney said he will make China accountable for the decades of currency manipulation, and that he will lower the corporate tax rate. Can't put the genie back in the bottle concerning the global economy, but it's unfair that the U.S. dollar is compared to other currencies and China holds the value of the Yuan down. We now have the highest corporate tax rate. Obama just mumbled something about closing tax loopholes...that's his economic strategy.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    are you really that deaf and blind to the FACTS? That's what we on earth call Republican's . . . .
    this is for you mittens - http://youtu.be/y0AcHR_0PzU
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    Ace Jackwagon - you can tell us what went wrong with Mr Flipper the Flopper on . . . .
    11.7.12 Clue he is a Teapublican all over the map.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • when reality hits you wrote...
    I like Romney, he is a nice man, but I cant vote for him, because I don't believe him.
    Its hard for me to believe in a person who hides things from the public view, like his refusal to make public all of his tax records. I would have allot easier time supporting Romney if his 5 point plan was laid out in detail. But as long as he reuses to play jump rope for the publics own good, how can I trust him to work honestly for me behind a closed door? It just feels wrong.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }