TOM TANGNEY

Rooting for Snowden, against my better judgement

Jun 25, 2013, 8:35 AM | Updated: 10:37 am

I find myself hoping Edward Snowden has a clean getaway – maybe because I’ve seen too m...

I find myself hoping Edward Snowden has a clean getaway - maybe because I've seen too many classic 1970's paranoia thrillers like Robert Redford's "Three Days of the Condor."

Does there seem to be a consensus building that Edward Snowden is more traitor than patriot? I think so.

So am I wrong to be rooting for Snowden to escape the clutches of the American government?

Probably.

But I find myself hoping he has a clean getaway from Russia and makes his way to Ecuador anyway.

Maybe it’s because I’ve seen too many classic 1970’s paranoia thrillers like Robert Redford’s “Three Days of the Condor” (or Warren Beatty’s “The Parallax View.”) In the Condor movie, Redford plays a bookish CIA researcher
who discovers a secret operation within the U.S. government that is wiping out certain CIA personnel and he’s next. His last act in the film is to drop off a bunch of secret files incriminating the killers.

It’s a very qualified happy ending: Redford has to stay off the grid for his own protection but at least the word is out about government misdeeds.

The parallel with Edward Snowden is admittedly wobbly and using Hollywood to explain the world is never a good idea. Nonetheless, there is something dramatic and admirable about a lone individual who’s willing to take on his own government for what he thinks is right.

Snowden has risked it all in order to expose the massive surveillance of its own citizens that our government, whether inadvertently or not, is involved in. And he has been pilloried and praised for what he’s done – being called everything from traitor to hero, from grandiose narcissist and arrogant punk to a man of honor and noble motives.

You’d think that anyone who could earn the condemnation of both President Obama and Dick Cheney must be a pretty bad dude. But – on the left – Daniel Ellsberg of Pentagon Papers fame (the Edward Snowden of the 1970’s perhaps?) sings Snowden’s praises for exposing an “executive coup” against the U.S. Constitution. And on the right, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul praises Snowden for being a truth-teller (as opposed to National Security adviser James Clapper, who Paul slams as a liar for his testimony denying what Snowden eventually revealed.)

The U.S. government considers him an outright spy, having charged Snowden with three counts of espionage.
His lawyer in Hong Kong considered that absurd, since he never spied for any other country but his own. But no one disputes that Snowden has broken the law with his release of classified, top secret documents. What has to be weighed in this case is whether the value of exposure trumps the need for secrecy.

This is where we, the general public, have to make hunches. We just don’t have enough information to judge this properly. The chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Republican Mike Rogers has complained that Snowden is looking at 3 or 4 pieces of a thousand piece puzzle and jumping to the wrong conclusions. That may very well be true.

But the public has even fewer pieces than that. How are we to know whom to believe? I suppose, ideally, we would all trust our government to be doing the right thing but that doesn’t come easily to most Americans. Nor should it. Skepticism is always in order to some degree and whistleblowers ground that skepticism.

When so many of the authority figures in Washington line up on one side of the ledger – condemning Snowden – I can’t tell if they are doing that to protect us or simply to save face. Clearly, Snowden has embarrassed the powers that be. But until the Obama administration can demonstrate some actual harm done to us as a result of Snowden’s revelations, I’ll remain skeptical. We seem to have survived the Pentagon Papers just fine.

I guess I want a few MORE pieces of the puzzle before I consign Snowden to a life behind American bars.

Related:

Dave Ross: America, the punching bag

Tom Tangney

Belfast...

Tom Tangney

Kenneth Branagh’s ‘Belfast’ is a crowd-pleaser that doesn’t quite hit the mark

"Belfast" has plenty to recommend itself but it's not nearly the moving testament to fraught times that Kenneth Branagh thinks it is or wants it to be.

2 years ago

Eternals, Marvel...

Tom Tangney

‘Eternals’ has to do a lot of heavy lifting for a single film

Imagine the daunting task Marvel sets for itself in "Eternals." It has to introduce 10 new superheroes, not to mention an entirely new cosmology.

2 years ago

French Dispatch...

Tom Tangney

‘The French Dispatch’ is unmistakably Andersonian

Wes Anderson is an acquired taste. But luckily, after 10 full-length movies, most critics and many movie-goers have acquired it.

2 years ago

Dune...

Tom Tangney

All set-up and no payoff: ‘Dune’ is world’s longest and most expensive trailer

It's hard to find the right metaphor for the new "Dune" movie. Whatever comparison you choose, it must reflect a sense of incompletion.

2 years ago

Last Duel...

Tom Tangney

Poor Marguerite’s story saves ‘The Last Duel’

Tom Tangney says, ultimately, The Last Duel is a proto-feminist take on the Middle Ages with Marguerite's take that brings the film into focus.

2 years ago

James Bond...

Tom Tangney

Daniel Craig’s final James Bond movie comes full-circle

The 25th installment in the James Bond movie franchise may be titled "No Time to Die," but "Too Much Time to Die" may be more fitting.

2 years ago

Rooting for Snowden, against my better judgement