Updated Jun 13, 2012 - 1:54 pm
Why Clemons has plenty of leverage with Seahawks
NFL players have to consider the possibility of alienating their teammates when deciding whether or not to hold out for a new contract, right?
Not necessarily according to Danny O'Neil, who covers the Seahawks for The Seattle Times and joined "Brock and Salk" on Wednesday to discuss Chris Clemons' contract-related absence from the team's mandatory minicamp.
"The resentment comes when a guy gets a big contract over someone whose production has outweighed that guy's," O'Neil said before going back nearly a decade to illustrate the point. "Chike Okeafor is a great example. Okeafor was [the Seahawks'] best pass rusher, they signed Grant Wistrom for more money, Wistrom was not as good a player -- even once he got here -- as Okeafor, and Okeafor was bent out of shape because it was, 'You paid someone else more money and I was doing a better job at that spot.'
"I don't think there's anybody in a locker room that begrudges someone taking a stand and really trying to do what's best for them."
In Wednesday's Wrap Up video, Mike Salk has a few more reasons why Clemons' decision to hold out makes plenty of sense.
You can download Wednesday's podcast here.
Related: Brock Huard says Clemons is hurting himself and the Seahawks
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.