Everyone has a story. What's yours?
Linda Thomas
twitter: @TheNewsChick
About Linda
Linda is the morning news anchor and features reporter for KIRO Radio. This is her local news blog, with an emphasis on social media, technology, Northwest companies, education, parenting, and anything else that grabs her attention.

If you have a news tip or story idea, I'd love to hear from you...

To leave a voice message for Linda about any of her stories call toll free 1-855-251-2363

Follow Me on Pinterest


AP photo
A BNSF train hauling coal to British Columbia heads north out of downtown Seattle. If a Gateway Pacific Terminal near Cherry Point is built, it's estimated 38 to 63 additional trains will pass through our state. (AP/Elaine Thompson photo)

Washington's coal train controversy pulls in to Seattle

There are very few issues that rattle people all over Washington State. A proposal to build a $665 million coal terminal near Bellingham is one of them.

Coal, the combustible black sedimentary rock that melted iron in furnaces and generated the steam for locomotive engines hundreds of years ago, is still used today.

It generates nearly 45 percent of the electricity in the U.S. and China is the largest consumer of coal in the world.

Most of the coal in the Western U.S. comes from Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming.

You don't need a math story problem to answer the question, if a train loaded with coal from the West is bound for China which state does it likely pass through?

Coal trains are already chugging through Washington.

If a planned Gateway Pacific Terminal near Cherry Point is built, an estimated 38 additional trains will roll through our state each day - including 18 a day in Seattle. Nearly 140 million tons of additional coal will be sent to China and other Asian customers each year.

The Cherry Point area is also home to the largest oil refinery in Washington. It's located northwest of Bellingham on the Strait of Georgia between Birch Bay and Lummi Bay.

"We came up with 22 reasons why this is a really bad idea," says Stoney Bird, a former corporate lawyer and Bellingham environmental activist.

Opponents' reasons range from "very local stuff," he says from noise and health problems for people who live beside the tracks, to impeding emergency vehicles that need to cross tracks, to the further wiping out of the herring stock at Cherry Point.

"There are environmental concerns with freighters which are the largest in the world, twice the size of the oil tankers that are allowed in Puget Sound now," says Bird.

Getting coal from its source, the earth's crust, involves digging large pits.

"The mines are dotting our country," says Bird. "Even greater is the global warming that will result from the burning of the coal."

The process of burning coal "releases a poisonous cocktail of gases into the environment." Carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and small airborne particles of coal are released.

One estimate from opponents of the Cherry Point plant says the amount of carbon dioxide from a single coal plant equates to the same effect as cutting down 161 million trees.

Coal supporters say increasing exports will boost the US economy and create jobs.

Business leaders in Bellingham believe SSA Marine, the project sponsor, has the ability to build the most "environmentally sound" shipping terminal in the world.

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen is among those who support the coal terminal. He believes Whatcom County needs more good jobs. In addition, the terminal will be a "good citizen" paying taxes along with wages.

Employment has been an issue in the region since the closure of the Georgia-Pacific pulp mill in Bellingham in 2001, although Whatcom County's unemployment rate - 6.4 percent - is lower than the state average of 8.2 percent. The development could bring up to 4,400 jobs to the region.

The export terminal is expected to generate $74-$92 million in state and local tax revenues.

If the environmental review is approved and the export terminal project gets a green light, Peabody Coal, the nation's largest coal company, would begin shipping 24 million tons of coal a year through the facility. The shipments would be ramped up to 48 million tons.

SSA Marine of Seattle would operate the terminal, while Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway would also benefit with an increase in its hauling business.

While many public hearings are ignored, the meetings to talk about coal have been crowded and contentious.

A meeting scheduled in Seattle last month had so much interest they had to find a bigger venue. That hearing is now set for Thursday, December 13 from 4 to 7 p.m. at the Washington State Convention Center.

Seattle has also been studying the impact of 18 coal trains per day passing through the city.

A study commissioned by the Seattle Department of Transportation found the coal trains would increase delays at railroad crossings by between one and three hours per day by 2026.

Not only would drivers be stuck at crossings longer, according to the Parametrix study, but there could be an increase in police and fire response times for emergencies, particularly in Seattle's SoDo area.

By LINDA THOMAS


MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (35)


  • Add A Comment

  • messiah101 wrote...
    But Why
    Do the trains need to be routed up the west coast of the State ? Why can't they be unloaded on the Colombia River?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheNewsChick wrote...
    Messiah101
    Some of the coal is unloaded on the Columbia, but the plan is to build a more efficient terminal to handle the increased demand. That distribution terminal was first proposed for the Cherry Point area of Washington (not far from the refinery) in 2010. Lots of discussions since then have lead to the environmental review and public hearings that are happening now.

    Mayor Mike McGinn is holding a press conference Wednesday to announce the city of Seattle’s next step in its effort to analyze the local impacts of 18 coal trains per day passing through Seattle.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Shplunker wrote...
    I can already hear McBikepath now...
    ..."18 trains a day won't be a problem for our traffic grid. If we can just get more people to ride their bicycle to work, and carpool, or take the light rail, then we will fine". WHAT A JOKE! The last thing this town and it's already miserable traffic needs is an additional 1 1/2 - 3 hours of train delays a day (5-10 minutes per x 18 trains).
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • roomtemp wrote...
    Go for it...
    I'm not a huge fan of using coal as a fuel, but we could use the jobs. It's also something that China will buy from us for a change.

    Seems like the traffic problems could be solved with a few strategically placed over/under passes.

    I'm less environmentally concerned with coal tankers than oil tankers. An accident seems like it would be easier to clean up. If it's not cleaned yet, it just makes a pile of rocks on the bottom.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • hpygolkyone wrote...
    Not So Fast Roomtemp..........
    Who said that China is *buying* this coal from the United States?

    We could just be giving it to them as repayment for funding our well thought out wars....you know, the ones where we went and rearranged the rock piles in Afghanistan?

    Maybe China is just sending over a freighter of antenna balls as fair trade, or cheap "Happy Meal" toys that eventually end up in our landfills.

    I must really have my snark on this morning. Stephen Hawking said it best when he said that the world has so little to fear from gamma ray bursts, black holes and asteroids......but that the end of the world will most likely come from mankind itself.

    What does my doomsday comment have to do with coal running through Washington on it's way to Bellingham and eventually to China? Probably a whole lot of nothing......maybe everything.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • RnD_Fan wrote...
    Through Seattle?
    Call me crazy but why would the trains need to be routed through Seattle?

    Wouldn't it be easier to circumvent Seattle altogether?

    We handle Nuclear Waste, dealing with Coal has GOT to be less dangerous!

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • DesertRez wrote...
    Its an unintended side affect
    from regulating coal power out of business. Developing countries need cheap energy like we did in the 19th-20th century. Asia will burn the coal and all we are doing is exporting air pollution. That's why the enviros are trying to find a reason to shut down transportation of coal, not for the other 20 reasons.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • ron prevost wrote...
    Evil coad meets evil cars. .. McGinn must be having a fit.
    But the thing that DOES bother me is those weekly mud slides across the tracks around Edmonds. .... But, then.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • sportsguru wrote...
    Man please
    If you don't find a way to ship that coal to China and any other country that use that coal and create jobs and income off of that resource. Would be one of the stupidest mistake in U.S. history as well as Seattle history.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • messiah101 wrote...
    Guru
    Sure you need to get the product to the marketplace however the extra coal trains equal almost 30 miles of trains 365 days a year (remember those long empty trains come back after dumping their loads)why not build the terminal in the Vancouver Wa area?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Canada will do it
    And you gotta love an environmental lawyer named Stoney Bird.... :D
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • justanotheridiot wrote...
    We buy...
    solar panels that dont work from them at 10x the price they buy coal from us that actualy does work for energy. LETS ALL GO GREEN and watch the world pass us by.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • messiah101 wrote...
    justanotheridiot
    Why would anyone buy solar panels that don't work ,and what does the cost of coal and solar panels have to do with anything?Nice thing about selling them coal is that the sales go on for ever but with solar the energy is provided free by the Sun.Those countries that don't include solar,wind.hydro,fossil,gas in their energy plan are the ones that will be hurting in the future. Remember that non renewable means exactly that
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    M101
    Ask Obama why anyone would buy solar ales that don't work? Better yet, ask Obama why his $Billion dollar SOLAR PLANTS DON'T WORK???
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Chuck Gould wrote...
    Edit: An extra 38 to 63 trains will roll through our state....
    Ok,but at what frequency? Per hour? Per day? Per month? Over the entire life of the terminal? :-)
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheNewsChick wrote...
    Updated Chuck
    Per day, initially 38 up to a max of 63. Also added the estimate of $74-$92 million in state and local tax revenues from the project.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Hickory1 wrote...
    Facts
    Where are you getting your numbers? Are you saying up to a maximum of 63 loaded coal trains through Seattle each day?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    If China is burning it why not us? . . . .
    If it was such a big deal with the environment why are we selling it to China? Put electric plants in the right to work States.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }