Everyone has a story. What's yours?
Linda Thomas
twitter: @TheNewsChick
About Linda
Linda is the morning news anchor and features reporter for KIRO Radio. This is her local news blog, with an emphasis on social media, technology, Northwest companies, education, parenting, and anything else that grabs her attention.

If you have a news tip or story idea, I'd love to hear from you...

To leave a voice message for Linda about any of her stories call toll free 1-855-251-2363

Follow Me on Pinterest


Obama.jpg
Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 1,000 children in Washington. In this photo President Obama visited a classroom to talk about the importance of universal pres-school in the United States. (Johnny Crawford/Atlanta Journal-Constitution/AP Photo)

Expect these automatic cuts in Washington state by Friday

We've been hearing about the impact of the potential federal cuts, the so-called "sequester" for weeks. Now the White House has listed a state-by-state breakdown of how we'd be impacted by the $85 billion in cuts that will kick in if Congress doesn't act.

Here is what it says will be cut this year alone in Washington state:

Teachers and Schools

Washington will lose approximately $11,606,000 in funding for primary and secondary education, putting around 160 teacher and aide jobs at risk. In addition about 11,000 fewer students would be served and approximately 50 fewer schools would receive funding.

Education for Children with Disabilities: In addition, Washington will lose approximately $11,251,000 in funds for about 140 teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities.

Child Care: Up to 800 disadvantaged and vulnerable children could lose access to child care.

Work-Study Jobs: Around 440 fewer low income students in Washington would receive aid to help them finance the costs of college and around 180 fewer students will get work-study jobs that help them pay for college.

Head Start: Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 1,000 children in Washington

Environment

Washington would lose about $3,301,000 in environmental funding to ensure clean water and air quality, as well as prevent pollution from pesticides and hazardous waste.

In addition, Washington could lose another $924,000 in grants for fish and wildlife protection.

Military Readiness

Approximately 29,000 civilian Department of Defense employees would be furloughed, reducing gross pay by around $173.4 million.

Army: Base operation funding would be cut by about $124 million.

Air Force: Funding for Air Force operations would be cut by about $3 million.

Navy: Cancel aircraft depot maintenance at Whidbey Island, a demolition project in Bremerton.

Law Enforcement and Public Safety

Washington will lose about $271,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law enforcement, prosecution and courts, crime prevention and education, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, and crime victim and witness initiatives.

Public Assistance and Health

Washington will lose about $661,000 in funding for job search assistance, referral, and placement.

Vaccines for Children: Around 2,850 fewer children will receive vaccines for diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, whooping cough, influenza, and Hepatitis B due to reduced funding for vaccinations of about $195,000.

Washington will lose approximately $642,000 in funds to help upgrade its ability to respond to public health threats including infectious diseases, natural disasters, and biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological events.

Washington will lose about $1,740,000 in grants to help prevent and treat substance abuse, resulting in around 3800 fewer admissions to substance abuse programs.

The Washington State Department of Health will lose about $174,000 resulting in around 4,300 fewer HIV tests.

STOP Violence Against Women Program: Washington could lose up to $143,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 500 fewer victims being served.

Nutrition Assistance for Seniors: Washington would lose approximately $1,053,000 in funds that provide meals for seniors.

The statement from the White House briefly explains what it considers to be the problem in Congress with budget negotiations:

"Unfortunately, many Republicans in Congress refuse to ask the wealthy to pay a little more by closing tax loopholes so that we can protect investments that are helping grow our economy and keep our country safe. By not asking the wealthy to pay a little more, Republicans are forcing our children, seniors, troops, military families and the entire middle class to bear the burden of deficit reduction.

The President is determined to cut spending and reduce the deficit in a balanced way, but he won't stick the middle class with the bill. The President is willing to compromise, but on behalf the middle class he cannot accept a deal that undercuts their economic security."

Republicans say Mr. Obama deserves his share of the blame for the budget problems and Republican Senator John McCain calling on President Obama to convene a summit meeting to work out an agreement.

"I won't put all the blame on the president of the United States, but the president leads," says McCain. "The president should be calling us over somewhere — Camp David, the White House, somewhere — and sitting us down and trying to avert these cuts."

By LINDA THOMAS

Related: The smallest military cuts sting the most - local ROTC program in jeopardy


MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (79)


  • Add A Comment

  • Mike Hunt wrote...
    @ Linda
    How about some honest reporting instead of regurgitating White house talking points

    The sequester will reduce 2013 planned spending by 85B... which is still 15 BILLION MORE THAN 2012! Real people call that a RAISE

    The real problem is the feds are planning on spending ~3.7 Trillion when only 2.7 Trillion is expected in revenue. The CBO revenue prediction of 2.7 trillion is also the most money the federal government has ever collected in history.

    Regurgitating nonsense doesn't help - this country has a SPENDING problem that all politicians are responsible for.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    Well, you know, Linda
    Is NOT a Liberal...She's claimed many times that we dont have any idea what her political leanings are. Yeah, right. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • happy happy joy joy wrote...
    the first order....
    The first order of business should be to cut back on pay for senators, congressman, their staffs, and their overall budget. Freeze their pay until our fiscal house is back in order. The first cuts should be to those receiving social security benefits when getting out of prison. Then limit benefits to 6 months to a year maximum. If you do not give people a reason to work and get off the Government dime, they won't. These ridiculous scare tactics are pathetic.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • It's me! Ha ha! wrote...
    So you believe we should not have rulers (Leaders)?
    NO messed up in the head number ONE! We don't have leaders nor rulers. We have ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES. Representatives who listen to the will of we the people. But your beloved Dear Leader only listens to those useful idiots who mindlessly support the party and give the Dear Leader 4 more years of this Obamunist insanity.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HPD 5-0 wrote...
    It's me....!
    shoots AND scores!!!! But we are supposed to obey the Great One, no questions asked. We are supposed to pick and choose what parts of The Constitution we adhere to....Just ask any liberal, socialist DimoRat.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • roomtemp wrote...
    No problems guys... I got this one...
    Suspend all foreign aid indefinitely. There's 50 billion a year shaved.

    Cap all federal pensions to a maximum of $50,000 yr. (Currently something like 674 billion in the red anyway.)

    Eliminate pensions and health care for congress completely. It's supposed to be a part time short term position, not a career.

    I could go on (way on!). But there's your 2% cut easy. No developmentally disabled children need suffer (Are you freaking kidding me with that fear-mongering s#?). No police, fire, teachers, need be fired. Meals can still have wheels, etc.

    At what point do people wake up and see the bovine excrement for what it is? (I know many here do, but I'm speaking generally. It's just pathetic at this point.) It's the same thing they do to us all the time with state gov. Run out of other people money and then start screeching about teachers, police, parks, roads, etc.

    A pox on all their houses...

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • maplefish wrote...
    RoomTemp...
    Hilarious & Brilliant! Thanks!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Realitycheck wrote...
    roomtemp
    We are a dying breed, you know, people with common sense.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SALIFE wrote...
    It's NOBAMA FAULT!
    Impeach Obama now!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }