Listen to Ross and Burbank weekdays on KIRO Radio 97.3 FM
Ross+Burbank


Bonneville Seattle is raising funds for the construction of a second Fisher House at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Tacoma and we need your help.
contagion.jpg
In the movie Contagion, researchers work to halt a deadly pandemic. In real life, experts are debating whether to again allow the development and testing of virus's for research some fear could escape the lab and cause another outbreak. (AP image)

Government debates allowing super virus development at risk of outbreak

In the movie "Contagion," a deadly virus created by researchers gets out of the lab and kills millions. Fears of the same thing happening in real life prompted a moratorium on real life tests with the deadly H1N1 virus that caused a worldwide pandemic. Now, the government is debating whether the benefits are worth the risk.

Federal health officials, researchers and and other experts have just concluded a two-day conference on whether to end the year-long moratorium.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, joined Ross and Burbank Wednesday to discuss the debate and the controversy.

"There's no clean answer to that (benefit vs. risk). It needs to be analyzed on a case by case basis. But you have to have some fundamental principles that you go by," Fauci says.

The Centers for Disease Control estimate the H1N1 or Bird Flu pandemic killed somewhere between 150,000 and 575,400 people in 2009, the first year the virus circulated. The vast majority were in Southeast Asia and Africa. Fauci says creating strains of the disease could help researchers identify and possibly treat future outbreaks.

"There's a great deal of concern of public health officials, particularly in that area of the world, that this virus the way that other virus's often do, is going to ultimately by mutations, assume the capability of transmitting more efficiently in humans," he says. And many argue that's why the testing needs to resume.

One thing is certain. Regardless of whether the controversial research is allowed to resume, pandemics will continue to happen. Fauci says the only question is how prepared we'll be for the next one.

"Is the knowledge gained really worth it? Is this something that is imminently going to happen in nature anyway so you better go ahead and find out what it's going to look like?" Fauci says.

If the research is allowed, Fauci insists it will be tightly controlled and no federal funding will be granted unless facilities are well regulated, with strict safety and security measures in place and diligent government oversight.

Experts at the meeting argued the moratorium has prevented badly needed work that could head off the next outbreak and needs to resume as soon as possible.

Fauci says the government will take comments on proposed rulemaking until January 10, then make a decision soon after. He insists whatever decision is made will be through a completely transparent process, and any approved research must be shared widely.

"Our mandate is to do basic and clinical research that adds to the fundamental knowledge that the world can use, so it is completely outside of our mandate to do classified research," Fauci said at the meeting. "When you do classified research, there's automatically a suspicion that somehow there's something maybe nefarious about that. And that's not the space the NIH is in, wants to be in, or ever will be in. We're not going to do classified research."

Some security experts worry that could essentially publicize the recipe for a potential bio-weapon, but Fauci insists any approved research would address those concerns.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Josh Kerns, MyNorthwest.com Reporter
Josh Kerns is co-host of KIRO Radio's Seattle Sounds (Saturday nights 7-8) and a digital content producer for MyNorthwest.com.

MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (2)


  • Add A Comment

  • ron prevost wrote...
    "Influenza" was an interesting study that came out a few years ago about the 1918-19 pandemic
    That was also an H1N1 that actually killed more people (numbers, not percentage) than any other pathogen in history.

    These experts are playing with fire that they think they can contain lethal mutations. there is just too much chance for something to go wrong. ... Of course, small pox would be extinct, save for some reflexive need to keep strains alive in a couple of American and Russian labs. ... For 'research'.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Zoeller wrote...
    "diligent government oversight"
    Ha Ha..The only thing's that the government is diligent about is collecting taxes and wasting our money.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }