Why must our schools always be compared with Finland?on November 16, 2012 @ 12:16 pm (Updated: 12:46 pm - 11/16/12 )
"Forty years ago, when we started to build this current school system, we decided to invest heavily in equity," said Sahlberg.
Which meant equal facilities and every teacher, even at the elementary level, getting a level of education similar to a medical degree.
They didn't set out to be the best! In fact, there was a fear that equity would create mediocrity, but it turned out to be just the opposite. Equality...created excellence.
Because at the same time Finland decided the schools would also be responsible for eradicating poverty.
"We understood that we wanted to make sure that everybody is ready to learn and that every child would be successful," said Sahlberg. "School has to be the place where everybody goes to; why we integrate and better these things to our school system. It's not socialism it's realism."
And Finnish realism says for education to be successful, poverty cannot be tolerated.
It's a fundamentally different approach to the idea of school readiness. Here in the U.S. we ask "is the child ready for for school?" Not in Finland.
Said Sahlberg, "In Finland when you speak about school readiness you ask whether the school, where children are coming is ready to host and welcome everybody as they are."
It may sound like rainbows and lollipops... but the data is unambiguous. This little country, with this simple idea, has made us look like the third world.
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.