When the roles were reversedon October 25, 2013 @ 8:46 am (Updated: 9:54 am - 10/25/13 )
Remarkably, seven years ago, it was just the opposite. Seven years ago, the Republicans had pushed through a plan to subsidize prescription drugs for Medicare patients: Medicare Part D.
But from the moment the plan when online, people were confused and Democrats were outraged.
"It is an outrage to be in the presence of people who are so confused and feeling abandoned," said Senator Hillary Clinton.
Democrats criticized the plan for being too complicated, and a budget buster since it wasn't paid for. Which was true, actually.
In any case, things were so bad, Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow demanded that the signup deadline be extended.
"Why should you be penalized because the government can't get it's act together?"
Sounds familiar, even though it was 7 1/2 years ago, but our story takes a twist. After lambasting the Republican Medicare plan, the Democrats did this:
"You give us a Democratic majority and we'll give you a real Medicare prescription drug benefit," said Stabenow.
They decided in 2006 to run on a promise of fixing the Republican plan.
And I was just thinking, considering the Republicans are hurting and how popular guaranteed health care is probably going to be, instead of running on a promise of repealing, why not run on a promise of fixing it?
It worked for the Democrats. In 2006, they won back the House - and that year a certain first-term senator decided to run for president.
Seattle's beleaguered tunnel project earns a spot atop a list of 11 'highway boondoggles'
'No War on Cars'
New head of Seattle DOT on controversies, congestion & the battle between bikes and cars
10 people you can't escape at Oktoberfest
Please login below with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing MyNorthwest account holders will need to create a new Disqus account or use one of the social logins provided below. Thank you.