The Andrew Walsh Show - Nights on KIRO Radio
Andrew Walsh
Tune in
Tune in to KIRO Radio weeknights at 7pm for The Andrew Walsh Show.


schoolofficer.jpg
Officer Rick Moore, of the Oakland School District Police, patrols Oakland Technical High School in Oakland, Calif. A mother's proposal to pay for a security guard at her daughter's school is sparking strong reactions on both sides of the debate. (AP image)

Mom paying for school security officer sparks strong reactions

President Obama vowed Monday in his inauguration address to take care of America's returning soldiers and veterans. And just last week he promised to increase funding for school security. But KIRO Radio's Don O'Neill of the Ron and Don Show says it "pissed him off" to see all the pomp and circumstance, along with the money spent, on the ceremony and security, while schools are scrambling to hire armed guards across the country.

Don's ire was was sparked by the story of a Florida mom who just cut a $12,000 check to cover the cost of an armed deputy to patrol her daughter's elementary school. Laurie Lauria agreed to cover the $32/hour cost of the officer for Old Kings Elementary after the Flagler County School District, which currently has armed officers at high schools and some middle schools, told her they couldn't afford more officers.

After seeing hundreds of police officers and soldiers who volunteered to line Obama's inauguration route, Don wonders why they aren't staffing local schools instead.

"Why not have a volunteer force out there right now, instead of flying to Washington, that will show up at a local school and provide security to kids, kind of like after 9/11," Don says.

It might seem unrealistic to expect officers or vets to volunteer their time or be able to dependably staff the nation's schools. But Don says many he knows would do just that. And he says if we're going to pay someone, it should be them.

"Why not hire some of them? They have the training. If you can roll through the mountains of Afghanistan, you can stand down locally at a local elementary school as we go through this very critical time."

President Obama last week proposed a new $150 million "Comprehensive School Safety program" that would "help school districts hire staff and make other critical investments in school safety."

That plan includes the creation of 1,000 new "school resource officers," that would be specially trained police officers that would work in schools.

But it likely won't be enough to cover all the cash strapped schools that want them. And while Don is angry, KIRO Radio's Andrew Walsh and many others think it's a great idea if parents can afford to fund security themselves.

"At first thought it was a bad precedent if parents who can afford it just throw money at problem," Walsh said. "But my opinion changed. It could be more than a person who just fires a gun if needed, but a person who could be a role model, and somebody the children could get to know."

Flagler County School District Superintendent Janet Valentine says the district is working on a plan to increase security at all schools. "But in the meantime while that happens, I personally felt like that was a wonderful opportunity and there would be no reason for us to say no," Valentine told the Daytona Beach News-Journal.

Many parents agree. "If I had the money I'd hire four or five. To know there's someone there if someone comes in with a gun, they could try and stop them before they kill more children," grandmother Gwen Hadley told WKMG TV about the plan to protect her grandson's school.

"If she has the money and she thinks that's a good use of it. We have too many schools in this country that don't have enough money for this kind of demand that's been brought on since the Newtown massacre," said KIRO Radio news editor Karen Taylor on The Andrew Walsh Show.

But many others think it sets a dangerous precedent, both for creating a further disparity between schools that have deep-pocketed parents and those struggling to just meet basic needs, along with the notion of having armed officers adding to the fear.

"Singular horrible events like [the Sandy Hook shooting] make us all upset, but if we look at the data, it doesn't make sense that that's where we need to beef up security in a very expensive way -- not only financially but also at the cost of our children's feeling of security," Kenneth Dodge, director of the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University told The Huffington Post last month. "Isn't it more straightforward to just get rid of the guns?"

But Don argues in the wake of all the recent shootings, "something funky is going on out there with mostly young men right now," and increasing security around schools is critical to ease concerns and prevent more shootings from happening. And the inauguration was just salt in the wounds.

"It's upsetting to me to see the pomp, the circumstance, the money and then say 'We don't have the money to help kids'."

Josh Kerns, MyNorthwest.com Reporter
Josh Kerns is co-host of KIRO Radio's Seattle Sounds (Saturday nights 7-8) and a digital content producer for MyNorthwest.com.

MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (19)


  • Add A Comment

  • flipper wrote...
    The interesting point...
    ...is that the "well off" mom is sending her kids to public schools, not private ones where, I'm sure, there's more than enough money (given tuition rates) to have armed security.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • awbitf wrote...
    Here's a take
    http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/12/this_weeks_over.html
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • shark75 wrote...
    So the libs admit it....
    They are afraid of the police.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Zoeller wrote...
    "the notion of having armed officers adding to the fear."
    Really????? What kind of wack job would think armed officers would add to fear for the children? All of the children I know feel safer around Police and armed trained profesionals.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • HLC wrote...
    Our local national guard spends time training every month.
    Rotate them as security in the schools. Wouldn't add a penny to the taxpayer. Probably cheaper with out food lodgeing and other training aids.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • O-man wrote...
    Opportunity Cost
    Money can fix all problems, problem is it is limited. Is this use of tax money the best way to save lives, or is there something better? As for the mom spending her own money go for it.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Ted Bundi wrote...
    proposed a new $150 million
    Here we go again, let's grow government again. Why can't Homeland Security take over this? They have the scanners I bought!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • CH wrote...
    Dumb and Dumber -
    coming off facebook? Dori can dish it out but he could not take it.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TwoTrees wrote...
    'Mom paying for school security officer sparks strong reactions'
    Taking matters into her own hands? Sounds like good, ol' fashioned American 'can do-ism'.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • smoke wrote...
    all in agreement
    So we all agree this is a terrible idea. Let's move on.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • messiah101 wrote...
    How do we pay for it?
    We tax every gun owned by the private citizens in the USA,annually,to cover ANY security costs.And we don't hire cops as they are not security guards.I for 1 believe that these school killing will continue the guard will be the first one shot.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • rational wrote...
    messiah101
    Will you also tax every knife owner to cover the risk of stabbings? And every baseball bat owner for the risk of a clubbing?

    It's likely that shooters will move on to easier targets rather than run the risk of failure in engaging an armed police officer.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • messiah101 wrote...
    Rational Get Real
    THese mass slaughters in our schools have been gun related so require the gun owners to pick up the tab,if in the future baseball bats,knifes,or ping pong balls are used to kill Americas children then let the buyers of those products share in the security costs also
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • rational wrote...
    messiah101
    They have for the most part been liberal related too...so why doesn't the DNC pay for the extra security?
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }