powered by Bonneville Seattle - News Talk 97.3 KIRO FM, 710 ESPN Seattle and 770 KTTH: The Truth


Sports
Seahawks Blog
710 ESPN Seattle
Blog   |   RSS   |   More Seahawks News   |   710 ESPN Seattle   |  

Updated Nov 19, 2009 - 12:20 pm

Steve Hutchinson: The Truth

Comments   |   Print this   |   E-mail this

huthc

By Dave Wyman

So the Hawks are facing their old left guard Steve Hutchinson this weekend in Minnesota and I thought we should all take a look at the Hutch debacle. Look….I liked the guy too. When it's all said and done, he could end up being one of the best guards to ever play the game. But here's an interesting fact I think we're all overlooking….HE'S A GUARD!!! Alex Gibbs, the offensive line coach in Denver when I played there is one of THE finest football coaches in the league (He's now with the Texans). His favorite quote to his offensive line was, "Hell, I can get a bum on the highway to play guard! Get me a good left tackle!" In Mora's press conference this week, somebody asked if the Hawks were going to game plan around Hutchinson. (Again….HE'S A GUARD!). After I wiped up the water I blew out through my nose, I started to reflect on the entire Hutch situation.

So here's the deal: If you want to say that the Hawks should've resigned him during the '04 or '05 season... fine. I have no quarrel with you there. But, I want to ask everyone this question: Did you recognize how good he was at that time? Be honest with yourself because I really believe that Hutch didn't become great in everyone's mind until he signed that $49 million deal. Remember in the '05 Redskin game when Shaun Alexander didn't pick up that first down? That play ended a game winning drive and lead to a loss in overtime. Yeah, that play was run over the left guard.

Sure we all knew he was good but were we ready to spend $49 million on... A GUARD?!

But outside of the Hawks not signing him before his contract expired, let's look at what they did do at the time. Of all the options available, Seahawk management really did Hutch a "solid" by putting the Transit ion Tag on him. This allowed him to go out and shop himself on the open market and then come back to the Hawks and say, "If you want to keep me, here's what everyone else out there thinks I'm worth." And think about that. The Hawks essentially told him this: We're not going to pay you what we think you're worth. We're not going to pay you what other offensive lineman get paid….we're going to pay you what every other team in the league thinks you're worth. That is the difference between selling your old couch at a garage sale in your neighborhood versus selling it on eBay! The Hawks allowed him to go out into the market.

Let me put it to you another way: If you were a hotshot employee at Safeway and it was time to renew your contract, which of the following would be the best option for you:

A) Sit down with management at Safeway and listen to them tell you what they think you're worth.

B) Go to Albertson's, Whole Foods, QFC and Piggly Wiggly and see what they think you're worth and then take your best offer back to Safeway.

And in the Seahawks' defense, they thought they would get to enter the last bid at the eBay auction. And so did everyone else until the NFL allowed this ridiculous "poison pill" clause agent Tom Condon wrote into the contract. The spirit of the Transition Tag was that the original team would get the opportunity to match the contract no matter what. THE END! This particular poison pill made that impossible and the NFL, for whatever reason, allowed it. As super-lawyer Jackie Chiles from Seinfeld would say: "It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous."

So if you want to get mad at someone over this whole thing, here is a list of people to be mad at:

1) Steve Hutchinson


2) Steve Hutchinson's agent


3) The NFL


4) Steve Hutchinson


5) The NFL


Be careful selecting option #1 & #4. I interviewed Hutch in the locker room after practice one day. Scariest human being I've ever been around.

Eklund seahawkhutch

All of that aside, here's one argument in favor of paying Hutch, A GUARD, whatever he wanted: That crap last Sunday when Darnell Dockett shoved his forearm into Matt Hasselbeck's neck…that would've been "handled"….by Hutch. Hutch was a quiet leader but he was THE Alpha Dog.

Man I miss Hutch!


  • Add A Comment

  • rajuseattle wrote...
    Hutch debacle is not the only thing SEahawks fan questioning....
    After he left Seattle Seahawks, what FO did to maintain the consistent NFL calibre O-line is the issue here. Had we maintained good O-line with good draft picks and FA signings probably nobody in Seattle would have questioned FO about Hutch deal....since everything went downhill path after his departure fans are upset with FO and probably thinking FO is responsible for the current O-line debacle. FO had good intentions of giving him Transition tag and allow him to fetch good value for his skills, but in the end Hutch is the one who signed that contract. If he loved Hawks he would have stayed with Hawks....its business DAVE and $$$ is the bottomline...emotions doesnt work in NFL...and their is no loyalty in PRO sports....FO should have put franchise TAG instead and deal with hutch with the business mind...rather rewarding him with Transition TAG.
  • HLC wrote...
    Missing him too.
    How good has Seattles running game been since he left? How about zip-zero-zilch. He was that good.
  • SchaiDog wrote...
    The Steve Hutchinson arguement
    With the struggles the past 2 years there seems to be a lot of people who want to blame Seahawks management for being unable to keep Steve Hutchinson after the 2005 season. They have used the example "look how the Vikings are doing with him". In 2006, Hutchinson's 1st season with the Vikings, Chester Taylor ran for over 1,000 yards; they were 22nd in total offensive yards (18th in passing and 16th in rushing) and ended up 6-10. In 2007 Adrian Peterson ran for over 1,000 yards; the Vikings were 13th in total offensive yards (28th in passing and 1st in rushing) and ended up 8-8). In 2008 Adrian Peterson again ran for well over 1,000 yards; the Vikings were 17th in total offensive yards (25th in passing and 5th in rushing) and they finished 10-6 and lost to the Eagles 26-14 in a wildcard game. So far this season with Hutchinson the Vikings are 8-1, 7th in total offensive yards (12th in passing and 10th in rushing). In 2006 the Seahawks didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher; they were 19th in total offensive yards (20th in passing and 14th in rushing), finsihed 9-7 and lost to the Bears 27-24 in the divisional playoffs. In 2007 they again didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher; they were 9th in total offensive yards (8th in passing and 20th in rushing) and they finished 10-6 and lost to the Packers 42-20 in a divisional playoff game. In 2008 they once again didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher; they were 28th in total offensive yards (29th in passing and 19th in rushing) and finsihed 4-12. So far this season they are 3-6 and are 16th in total offensive yards (13th in passing and 27th in rushing). Could the Seahawks have done better with Hutchinson and possibly returned to the Super Bowl? Nobody honestly knows. Any team's success or failure is not dependent on any single player as seen last season with the Seahawks. They had so many injuries that a healthy Steve Hutchinson would have made very little difference
  • Bcleve wrote...
    Seahawks Blog - "access" under construction (NOT WSDOT)
    Thanks for the fix via web cover story -will try again tomorrow; fingers & toes XXX....
  • Bcleve wrote...
    Somewhere in the shadows....
    Someone in media should interview Tom Condon, just to see what his philosophies on clients are. Sometimes the people revolving on the periphery of sports life are much more intriguing than sports items themselves. There's much more to it, I wonder, than "show me the money, dude." It can be done nicely, can't it?!
  • pawleec wrote...
    thanks DAVE!! great post!!
    After 2005, re-signing Hutch was the top priority. It didn't happen, but I've always blamed Hutch. The line play in 2005 was at it's pinnacle. The stars aligned in 2005, Tobeck and Strong were Pro-bowlers. Walt was in his PRIME!! Alexander was running hard after his "back stabbing in 2004" he was promised to be a free agent after being Franchised tagged. (Ruskell's idea) The whole offense was at it's best. Leading up to 2005 I remember thinking 'why the heck can't they pick up a blitz and why can't they pick up a critical first down.' The idea that Hutch was some sort of a GOD is a joke. I miss Hutch's attitude....for sure, but they had plenty of issues with the line leading up to 2005. He and the Vikings have done nothing until Peterson and Farve came along. If I blame Ruskell is that he has not fixed the situation.
  • liame wrote...
    Stats, stats, stats....
    ...And yet who is winning...more importantly...who isn't? Are you reading the talking points from Seahawk mngmt? Game winning drive? How do you know? Are you for real? LOL! Just ask Alexander how he feels about SH leaving. Yes the tackle, and in Hasselbeck's situation the left tackle is probably the most important position protecting him. But does it really matter whether Hasselbeck sees the 'enemy' coming or not? He has no scrambling abiltiy what-so-ever! He is an average quarterback with a terrible offensive line. The 2 never shall meet, unless you reside in Seattle!!!
  • tank51 wrote...
    DAVE WYMAN.... You are just a Nut bag......
    Are you kidding me Dave?.........The only REASON Alexander EVER got the GREAT years he did was because of BIG Walt & Hutch....Every team we faced KNEW we were running to the LEFT right behind those TWO GUYS...................Did you notice DAVE how our running game stalled after Hutch left and hasn't been the same sense?????????.....I BLAME RUSKELL for loosing Hutch and no one else....DON'T BE SUCH A TOOL OK DAVID!!!
  • CooterTheGreat wrote...
    Being a man
    Let's speculate a bit. What probably happened here...same stuff FO did w/ Womack, Willis, Gray. They went to Hutch, man to man, and said, "Chris, go see what's out there, then come back and let's talk about it. We want you here, but we want you to get a fair market value." They did the same w/ Ken Lucas and said, best of luck in Carolina. It's Chris' fault he's gone. By letting his agent write that into the contract, he basically told the FO where to go. #1 and #4 from your list is right and the Transition Tag means nothing. The new CBA either won't have it or it will be revised. After the contract was written, did Chris come back to Seattle...talk about it. Nope, he stayed in Minnesota, probably fishing on the lakes.
  • liame wrote...
    CooterTheGreat....
    Who is Chris?






News
Local
National
World
Money
Lifestyle
Sci/Tech
Odd News
Politics

Multimedia
Photo Galleries
Videos
Sports
Mariners
Seahawks
Sounders
College
Storm
Blogs
NBA
Golf
NHL
Tennis
Olympics
Auto Racing
Entertainment
Dining
Movies
Movie Times
Calendar of Events
Entertainment News
Television
Travel
Tom Douglas
Chef Jeremy
Tom Tangney
Fit in the City
Seattle Fashionistas
the mixtape
Weather
Local Conditions
School Closings
Earthquake Tracker

Traffic
Current Conditions

Podcasts
Download past shows
Daily audio roll
Blogs
Dave Ross
Dori Monson
Ron and Don
TBTL
David Boze
Michael Medved
Frank Shiers
Phil the News Junkie
MyNorthwest Blog
Shannon Drayer
Kevin Calabro
Brock and Salk
97.3 KIRO FM
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Events/Contests
Press Releases
Community Outreach

770 KTTH: The Truth
Shows/Hosts
Schedule

710 ESPN Seattle
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Home   |   Contact Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Copyright Infringement   |   Employment   |   EEO Public File Report   |   Contest Rules   |   Set Us as Your Home Page   |   RSS
Copyright © 2010 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.