powered by Bonneville Seattle - News Talk 97.3 KIRO FM and 770 KTTH: The Truth

Updated Nov 3, 2009 - 1:15 pm

Voters get final say on gay partnerships

Comments   |   Print this   |   E-mail this   |  
By RACHEL LA CORTE
Associated Press Writer

Washington state residents were voting Tuesday whether to approve the state's new "everything but marriage" law or to roll back more than 200 rights and benefits granted to thousands of gay and senior couples.

Referendum 71 asks voters to approve or reject the final expansion to the state's domestic partnership law, which grants registered domestic partners additional state-granted rights currently given only to married couples.

Opponents of the new law say it is a threat to traditional marriage. Supporters of gay rights say same-sex couples need additional legal protections and rights.

The expanded law would add benefits, such as the right to use sick leave to care for a domestic partner, and rights related to adoption, child custody, and child support.

The law was supposed to take effect July 26, but now will go on the books only if approved by voters. If rejected, previously enacted legislation on domestic partnerships would remain in place.

The underlying domestic partnership law, which the Legislature passed in 2007, provided hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations, and inheritance rights when there is no will. Under state law, senior couples can register as domestic partnerships as well.

Last year, lawmakers expanded that law to give domestic partners standing under laws covering probate and trusts, community property and guardianship.

More than 12,000 people in Washington state are registered as domestic partners. Most of the couples are gay.

Washington state, along with several other states, including California, Oregon and New Jersey, have laws that either recognize civil unions or domestic partnerships that afford same-sex couples similar rights to marriage.

Same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa and Vermont, and will start in New Hampshire in January. A referendum in Maine on Tuesday will determine the fate of a same-sex marriage bill passed by the Legislature in May.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Comments (11)
  • Add A Comment

  • sp5937 wrote...
    This prop is going to
    definitely be rejected. The GOOD people of Washington are not ready to approve teh MARRIAGE or ALMOST MARRIAGE of queers. Personally, I will fight against it till I draw my last breath.
  • odroku wrote...
    why do you care?
    seriously, what difference does it make to you personally if gays are allowed the rights as detailed in the story above? maybe you need a hobby. or a hug.
  • Rick (4) wrote...
    Actually, I think it will pass, but...
    The law as written is unconstitutional and will be thrown out by the courts. It is unconstitutional, because it grants special rights to people 62 years of age and older, that other hetrosexual couples can not have.
  • Loud Larry wrote...
    Bogus mail in ballots
    I am not at all comfortable with the mail in only ballot count. A few thoughts; Chief Communications Officer Kim Van Ekstrom states that “undecided voters have been slow so far to return their ballots”…and that is bad because… People are taking their time weighing the candidates and the issues? I’ve heard more than one mail-in voter complain that had they waited until today to vote they would have voted differently based on late breaking revelations and allegations regarding candidates and initiatives. Yes the onus is on the voter to hopefully make an informed decision, yet the Election Office pushes people to send in their ballots early. They also suggest not counting on the post office to post mark your ballot accurately if mailed too close to the deadline so you need to find a ballot drop off location. That is what I did this morning. At 8:00 am there were 15 to 20 other folks dropping off ballots in the collection receptacle. Ten or so of us lamented the loss of community that was shared at the polling locations. We also agreed that the mail in ballot system is complicated enough and vague enough to cause SOME to not vote. Our biggest concern was the removal of anonymity from our vote. We have to sign the ballot; albeit the envelope, but we trust that our name on the envelope won’t be reconciled with how I voted. With all the privacy issues at stake with the initiative process, what assurance do I have that my vote is anonymous and won’t EVER be held against me? There is something tangible, satisfying and accurate about voting in person with reasonable exceptions.
  • sp5937 wrote...
    Why do I care?
    Homosexuality is perverse, does not need to be taught in schools to children, children do not need to be allowed to be adopted to them, and even though this generation is fast becoming completely anti_Christ, the Bible is STILL TRUE. Homosexuality is an abomination to God. There is absolutely no "special right" that needs to be given, voted in, donated, or provided for this lifestyle. If they deserve itn then EVERY PERVERSE LIFESTYLE DESERVES IT. But none do, so none should get it. It was attached to this older adult bill just so that it would make it more difficult to get it voted down, but enough GOOD people see throught at, and will definitely vote it out. Thanks GOD!!!!!
  • Rick (4) wrote...
    RE: sp5937
    With all the hatred you are spreading, how can you call yourself a Christian? Have you ever read the Gospels of Christ?

    Did you here that the Pope has changed the rules, and they now welcome gays into the churches in England.

  • odroku wrote...
    ahh. the Bible
    a book of fiction about a man who preaches love, but somehow is cantilevered into a tool of hate. Yeah, I've heard of it. Do you have any problem with the law based on things that occur in real life and deal with the planet Earth and the very real people who live on it? All being equal, I still don't know how this effects anyone negatively. If all you have is your belief in an mythology, then you really should keep such rules within your community of like thinkers and allow the larger community to get along and interact in a dignified manner. I keep hearing how it's going to somehow negatively impact marriage, yet I cannot think of one single way my own marriage would change the next day, legally or otherwise.
  • SeattleNative wrote...
    odroku, it is quite apparent that you have no idea what the Bible is
    There is the Old Testament, which provides teachings to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike (although the Koran is the "ultimate" Muslim prophecy), and then there is the New Testament, which contains the Gospels of Jesus, the Epistles, Acts of the Apostles, and Revelation....what you call a "book of fiction about a man who preaches love."

    The Old Testament has several passages where homosexuality is considered to be against laws of God and man. This is universal for any of the world religions that believe that the Old Testament contains writings of God's prophets.

    Jesus was a Jew who was intimately knowledgeable of the ancient scriptures. He taught to "love thy neighbor as thyself." But he also taught the difference between right and wrong. As the Old Testament considers homosexuality to be an abomination against God and man, I can only assume that Jesus considered them the same. Assuming anything different makes absolutely no sense.

  • SeattleNative wrote...
    Rick
    There is a big difference between accepting the person, and accepting the lifestyle.

    From New York Times, 10/20/09: "VATICAN CITY — In an extraordinary bid to lure traditionalist Anglicans en masse, the Vatican said Tuesday that it would make it easier for Anglicans uncomfortable with their church’s acceptance of female priests and openly gay bishops to join the Roman Catholic Church while retaining many of their traditions."

    It seems that parishioners of the Church of England, who believe in the direct apostolic descendancy of Christ, realize that something has gone horribly askew in their church's bid for "political correctness". I guess they believe the one place where there should be a line drawn between "moral" and "immoral" is in religion. Imagine that.

  • odroku wrote...
    SeattleNative, in your rush to pat yourself on the back and show everyone how smart you are
    you missed the entire point. Religion = mythology Has no place in reality-based issues. Faith and belief should remain a personal choice and not infringe on the civil liberties of others. dealing with modern issues based on the interpreted 'teachings' of someone who lived presumably about 2000 years ago should automatically disqualify you from having input in the first place. If you can't think for yourself without leaning on your mythology, then you're not really engaging in the community as it exists in the first place. you can keep both your 'holier than thou' AND your 'smarter than thou' where it has relevance, which isn't much outside your ego.


More headlines...







News
Local
National
World
Money
Lifestyle
Sci/Tech
Odd News
Politics

Multimedia
Photo Galleries
Videos
Sports
Mariners
Seahawks
Sounders
College
Storm
Blogs
NBA
Golf
NHL
Tennis
Olympics
Auto Racing
Entertainment
Dining
Movies
Movie Times
Calendar of Events
Entertainment News
Television
Travel
Tom Douglas
Chef Jeremy
Tom Tangney
Fit in the City
Seattle Fashionistas
the mixtape
Weather
Local Conditions
School Closings
Earthquake Tracker

Traffic
Current Conditions

Podcasts
Download past shows
Daily audio roll
Blogs
Dave Ross
Dori Monson
Ron and Don
TBTL
David Boze
Michael Medved
Frank Shiers
Phil the News Junkie
MyNorthwest Blog
Shannon Drayer
Kevin Calabro
Brock and Salk
97.3 KIRO FM
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Events/Contests
Press Releases
Community Outreach

770 KTTH: The Truth
Shows/Hosts
Schedule

710 ESPN Seattle
Shows/Hosts
Schedule
Home   |   Contact Us   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement   |   Copyright Infringement   |   Employment   |   EEO Public File Report   |   Contest Rules   |   Set Us as Your Home Page   |   RSS
Copyright © 2010 Bonneville International. All rights reserved.