Everyone has a story. What's yours?
Linda Thomas
twitter: @TheNewsChick
About Linda
Linda is the morning news anchor and features reporter for KIRO Radio. This is her local news blog, with an emphasis on social media, technology, Northwest companies, education, parenting, and anything else that grabs her attention.

If you have a news tip or story idea, I'd love to hear from you...

To leave a voice message for Linda about any of her stories call toll free 1-855-251-2363

Follow Me on Pinterest


Bill Nye and nuclear reactors 101

Japan's chief cabinet secretary announced that cooling had failed at a second reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, 170 miles north of Tokyo. The new problem comes one day after officials flooded the crippled No. 1 reactor at the plant with seawater too cool it. An explosion caused by hydrogen tore the outer wall and roof off the building that housed the reactor.

BillNyeFor awhile this weekend, a top trending topic on Twitter was "Bill Nye." CNN brought in Bill Nye the Science Guy, who began his career in Seattle at Boeing, to explain what might be going on with Japan's nuclear reactors.

In an interview from Los Angeles , Nye says it's unlikely we're getting accurate information from Japan.

"To assert that things are under control when you see an explosion like this is unsettling," says Nye.

The Washington State Department of Health does not expect health risks in our state related to what's happening in Japan.

"We understand people may be concerned about a possible health risk from the nuclear reactor in Japan, and while we are monitoring the situation, we expect no health risk," they say in a statement.

Even without a risk to our health, many of us are concerned about people in Japan. I'm realizing how little I know about nuclear power. A friend of mine at the University of Washington, Kathy Gill, has compiled an educational resource for understanding how nuclear reactors work, based on research with a nuclear scientist and other experts.

Explainer: Nuclear Power, Meltdowns and Why Japan is Not Chernobyl

boiling-water-reactor

What happens when you shut down a nuclear power plant?

The self-sustaining (critical) atomic reaction that runs a reactor can be shut off in a matter of seconds; the goal is to keep the reactor sub-critical. The core material, which is radioactive, will generate heat, at a decreasing rate, for some time. Therefore, nuclear engineers need a way to keep this heat from building up in order to protect the radioactive fuel (rods) and the reactor.

In order to cool the reactor, nuclear plants must have power that runs a complex system of motors, valves and instruments that push water through the nuclear core and carry the heat elsewhere; newer plants have been engineered to simplify this system. Should there be a loss of electricity from the power grid, diesel generators provide emergency power. Should the diesel generators fail, the battery-powered systems can keep water over the core for short periods.

The initial cooling process is fairly rapid; within the first hour after shut down, decay heat may decrease to about 2 percent of the pre-shutdown level. This drops to about 1 percent of the pre-shutdown level after the first day.

In answering the question: Is this another Chernobyl? Gill writes:

In a word, no. The situation in Japan is different from Chernobyl, which had a completely different nuclear power plant design. Chernobyl had an inherently unstable graphite-moderated reactor, not an inherently stable water-cooled reactor. In addition, all western (modern) reactors must have a containment building; Chernobyl did not have one. Therefore, even if the reactor core in Japan were to melt, the primary containment, a steel liner surrounding the reactor core, should limit the release of radiation. However, we do not know if the primary containment was weakened by the earthquake. Nevertheless, the longer the time between shut-down and collapse the better the outlook because the reactor generates less and less heat with time.


MyNorthwest.com - Purpose of Comments statement
Bonneville Media encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comments can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior. We encourage your thoughtful comments which: have a positive and constructive tone, are on topic, are respectful toward others and their opinions. Bonneville reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

Comments (37)


  • Add A Comment

  • clevesside wrote...
    Again every day is a news day...
    so major hat tip to our 24/7/365 reporter pounding those dingdang keys. Not sure what to say of the degree of damage to EACH nuclear reactor in Japan beside those with known significnat damage but confident the people there will be forthright, open and only requesting assistance if they feel it's warranted. Next week will be spent assessing the true comprehensive numbers for all damage, glowing or not. Next week will also be a good time to find out who Japan's neighbors really are. So far S. Korea has pitched in. More to follow??
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • roomtemp wrote...
    @MYNW
    -echoes crowd- Yeah, extra credit for News Chick for off hours stories. Pay up MYNW! Don't mess with News Chick fans or we'll send you several harshly worded letters!

    @kegill... Thanks for your submission. And...

    ˙ʇxǝʇ ɹno ƃuıʇʇɐɯɹoɟ ɹoɟ sɯɥʇıɹoƃlɐ ʇsǝuıɟ ǝɥʇ ʇnq ƃuıɥʇou ǝsn ǝʍ ʇɐɥʇ noʎ ɯɹoɟuı oʇ ǝʞıl plnoʍ ʍuʎɯ ʇɐ ǝʍ

    Sadly, I don't think MYNW knows about phpBB.

    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Matt Lattanzi wrote...
    .
    Bill ye the Science Guy BILL BILL BILL BILL!!!!
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • SeattleNative wrote...
    When the roofs and walls blow out of your containment buildings...
    ...I can't imagine your reactor is still "contained".
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • messiah101 wrote...
    The Nuclear Industry started the spin early on this disaster
    You can see that they learned from the past.They have been licking their chops at the money they look to make and they are not going to allow a simple 3 Reactor partial melt down stand in the way of the cash jackpot. Their spin artists have been appearing regularly on all network TV and are really trying to push the notion that this is no BIG DEAL.Telling people to put towels over their mouth and keep windows and doors shut is as stupid as the advice I was given as a youth to get under my school desk in the event of a nuclear attack.Look the US Navy has seen this to be a big enough threat that they RELOCATED the carrier group.Its funny how things change if you asked me last week if I thought building Reactors in the USA was a good idea I would have said SURE.Oh by the way 30 yrs ago I worked at a Nuke Plant (Indian Point NY)on a steam generator repair crew and after working there became anti nuke but have changed my mind over time recognizing the safety record that these plants have. I forgot the important issue they need to be PERFECT and thats not possible
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • TheNewsChick wrote...
    Roomtemp
    Not related to this subject, but to your post - I'm impressed. I can't get any coding to work with the blogging software we use. Well done.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • W900A wrote...
    Not a Nuke engineer
    He doesn't know anything about the Chernobyl reactor - pretty obvious. They were liquid sodium cooled - not water cooled. They produce a lot of power at the risk of being far more risky. None of these accidents will approach the Chernobyl disaster. I know people are afraid of the boogie man of nuclear power. Think of this - the catastrophe that was this earthquake is so extreme. I believe our reactors are safer to begin with. Also the US Navy has operated reactors safely for nearly 60 years. There are some things people don't realize about their exposure to radioactivity - you are exposed in mountainous areas all the time, you are exposed flying on air liners due to the altitudes. Living in Denver you are exposed to quite a lot of background radiation. The Tsunami is the real killer here. In the end it will kill the most people, other earthquake damage second. If anyone dies due to these radiation leaks, it will be the plant workers and engineers immediately exposes and I suspect the numbers affected in the end will be minute compared to all the others killed by this tragedy. I believe nuclear power is on a whole very safe, safer and cleaner then just about any other form. A plant built today will be far safer then those built 20-30-40 years ago. The plants in question I believe are from the 70's and in the end I think we will find they don't have the redundancies that the US plants do.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Pam Lynn wrote...
    Question about the japan meltdown process. Sort of.
    They are using seawater to help cool down the reactor. Can the salt from the seawater affect the rods in a weird way or clotted up the port that hold those big rods? Just curious on this that all.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Dark Jedi wrote...
    My take on Bill Nye's opinion
    I trust Bill Nye's opinion than some TV stations facts. When I see a TV station (who shall go unnamed) claim that it could be as bad a Hiroshima, I shake my head in disbelief.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • Flick wrote...
    I'm leaning toward the Nye guy at this point . . .
    We should keep in mind that ALL of the public "analysis" and speculation concerning the situation is based upon what we've been told by individuals with some serious vested interests. There is almost zero information available from an objective, independent information source. We don't "know" that the reactors were completely shut down, that the reactor vessels are actually intact, or anything else. Maybe something is lost in the translation, but some of the explanations are highly suspect. There has been talk of "walls crumbling" in association with the both explosions. (I even heard on the NHK English station that the first explosion was CAUSED by a "wall crumbling".) If you've seen the videos, the walls didn't "crumble" -- they were blown to bits, with visible pieces scattered hundreds of meters away by two extremely powerful explosions. It's hard to accept all the bland pronouncements of how innocuous those detonations were. And that's just two examples. All the talk about radiation seems seriously understated, given the U.S. Navy reports detecting at least SOME increased radiation 60 miles(!) away. Seems like what little scraps of independent information that we do get is at wide variance with the official line.
    { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }
  • { "Thumbs Up":"1","Thumbs Down":"-1" }