Washington sheriff standards law partially blocked by judge
Apr 29, 2026, 5:45 PM | Updated: 6:28 pm
A photo of a King County Sheriff's Office badge. (Photo courtesy of KIRO 7)
(Photo courtesy of KIRO 7)
A judge partially blocked Washington’s new sheriff standards law one day before it was set to take effect.
“Today, the constitution won, and the right of the people to elect their own representatives without supervision from Olympia was upheld,” Attorney Mark Lamb told “The Jason Rantz Show” on Seattle Red.
Senate Bill 5974 sets new professional standards for sheriffs and police chiefs, and allows the Criminal Justice Training Commission to revoke certification for misconduct, triggering automatic removal from office for elected sheriffs.
The law requires sheriff candidates to sign a sworn statement confirming compliance with the commission’s standards. It also raises the minimum age for candidates from 18 to 25, requires at least five years of full-time law enforcement experience, mandates background checks, and bars candidates with disqualifying criminal histories.
While the new ruling blocks those provisions as they apply to elected sheriffs, it does not block them for appointed sheriffs, according to The Washington State Standard. The ruling also does not block a separate provision restricting the use of police volunteers, which is set to take effect later.
Eastern WA sheriffs file suit against sheriff standards law
Four eastern Washington sheriffs up for election this year — John Nowels of Spokane County, Glenn Blakeslee of Pend Oreille County, Brad Manke of Stevens County, and Ray Maycumber of Ferry County — filed a lawsuit to block the law, arguing it is unconstitutional and amounts to a “loyalty oath” that could allow the state, rather than voters, to control who can run for sheriff.
Lamb argued the requirement could infringe on free speech.
“We’re talking about the gravest possible consequence under the First Amendment, where time is of the essence,” Lamb explained. “In this situation, that an abridgment of a First Amendment right, even for minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes an irreparable injury.”
State attorneys, led by Solicitor General Noah Purcell, countered that sheriff candidates already certify similar standards under existing law and said the lawsuit is based on a misunderstanding of the statute.
“All of the plaintiff sheriffs are currently certified by the Criminal Justice Training Commission. They are currently certified under the exact standard that they’re saying they can’t possibly comply with,” Purcell said in court earlier this month. “So, the idea that somehow, in the next two weeks, something’s going to change that will render them unable to comply with that law just doesn’t it doesn’t pass the smell test. It just doesn’t make any sense.”
The state plans to appeal the ruling, according to The Washington State Standard.
Contributing: Luke Duecy, Charlie Harger, and Frank Lenzi, KIRO Newsradio; Julia Dallas, MyNorthwest



