Nevada governor signs sweeping crime bill as state looks to boost tourism
Dec 2, 2025, 5:12 PM | Updated: 5:58 pm
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo signed his sweeping crime package into law over the weekend that will help revive a unique court program that barred offenders of some crimes from the Las Vegas Strip and will stiffen penalties for smash-and-grab robberies, DUIs, and assault and battery against hospitality workers.
Known as the Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act, the law paves the way for the reinstitution of the controversial Resort Corridor Court to penalize crimes such as petty theft, assault, drug offenses and loitering originating on the Las Vegas Strip and coinciding with orders banning people from the tourist area for a year.
The bill’s passage marked a major political win for the Republican governor as he prepares for a challenging reelection campaign in 2026. His race is one of the most competitive in the country, and recent polling shows him and his likely opponent Democrat Attorney General Aaron Ford neck-and-neck.
Resort lobbyists and the union representing hospitality workers — both political powerhouses — teamed up to see the Resort Corridor Court reopened, arguing it will improve safety and protect the visitor-friendly reputation of the state’s key tourist attraction amid a slump in tourism.
Between June 2024 and June 2025, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority reported an 11% decline in visitors.
Opponents question its legality and say the orders unfairly target homeless people.
“We greatly appreciate Governor Lombardo and legislative leadership for working together to advance this important tourism-safety legislation,” said Virginia Valentine, the president and CEO of the Nevada Resort Association, in a Tuesday statement, adding that the court will ensure Las Vegas remains a premier tourism destination.
The law authorizes the Clark County Commission to revive the court, but it is unclear when – or if – the commission will take up the issue.
Jennifer Cooper, a spokesperson for the county, said it is premature for the commission to engage at this point because the discretion to revive the court lies with the Justice Court. The court did not return requests for comment.
Nevada judges instituted the court two years ago, but they voted to disband it a year and a half later.
If the court program is revived, litigation challenging its legality is expected, according to Athar Haseebullah, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, which has been a staunch opponent of the court.
“There will continue to be pushback by our organization and by so many others who don’t want to see this continued creep of privatization of our judicial system,” he said in a phone interview.
The bill also included amendments prohibiting immigration enforcement officers from entering school grounds without a warrant and requiring detention facilities to maintain a running list of the people they hold.
Nevada joins states like California and Maryland in enacting laws restricting federal immigration enforcement officers from accessing school property without a warrant.
Democratic lawmakers in Nevada put forward a proposal in the last regular session to bar immigration officials from school grounds without a warrant, but Lombardo vetoed it, calling it “well-intentioned but fundamentally overbroad.” Lombardo’s office said the amendment Democrats added to his bill abides by the constitution and includes exceptions that allow law enforcement officers to keep schools safe.
Those exceptions include school resource officers and law enforcement who need to enter the property in case of an emergency, such as a school shooting.
It is the latest state effort to make immigration enforcement restrictions clear following a Trump administration announcement at the beginning of the year that it would allow federal immigration agencies to make arrests at schools, churches and hospitals, ending a policy that had been in effect since 2011.
Cecelia González, a Democratic assemblymember who sponsored the original immigration bill, ultimately voted against the governor’s crime package. She said she is happy that “students are finally being taken seriously about their real, lived fear” but overall thinks the bill will do more harm than good.
