Washington lawmaker says letting government offer internet ‘gives us another option’

Jan 28, 2021, 5:52 PM
broadband internet, remote learning...
Third grade teacher Cara Denison speaks with students virtually while live streaming her class via Google Meet at Rogers International School on Nov. 19, 2020 in Stamford, Connecticut. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
(Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

Do you hate your internet provider? Or maybe you’re one of many people who only have one option to choose from? So here’s a question for you: How would you feel about a government option for your internet? Representative Drew Hansen of Kitsap County is the sponsor of a new bill in Olympia that would allow local government to offer broadband internet.

Internet access proves necessary to ‘participate in life’ during pandemic

“We have a lot of people in this state who just either don’t have high speed internet access at all, or they have it and it’s expensive, and it’s not very good,” Hansen explained. “We had a hearing yesterday on this bill, and we heard people from all over the state, like a mom in the Spokane Valley who has a special needs kid who, you know, she’s got to drive some place to get fast enough internet to testify at the hearing. People in rural Washington and forested areas who have no internet at all.”

“And here’s the weird part,” Hansen continued. “Washington is one of a minority of states that says governments like public utility districts or ports just can’t provide internet access, it’s illegal to customers, to normal customers like you or me.”

While Hansen admits he’s not sure if government provided broadband internet would work in every situation, he believes they should at least be able to try.

This bill also wouldn’t only benefit people in rural areas.

“It potentially benefits everybody,” he said. “… The Port of Seattle came, they signed in to testify in support of my bills, one of the port commissioners. The restriction effects public utility districts and ports all around the state. And this is the kind of thing where there’s economies of scale, right? The bigger the entity that could be providing the service, probably the more likely it is that they could make it pencil out economically.”

“Take my district, Kitsap County, we’re kind of rural, we’re kind of urban, we’re kind of suburban. It’s not like we’re 10,000 miles away from anything. Kitsap County is dying to have this authority,” Hansen said. “They think they can pull this off. And so that’s the whole point of the bill is just why can’t they try? At least remove the restriction, let them try to provide broadband to the public. And if it works, great. If it doesn’t, we’re no worse off than we are right now.”

One criticism or pushback to this idea, Ursula points out, is that some people don’t trust that the government will really do a better job. Hansen says he has an easy answer to that.

“[In] a majority of states in this country, they allow the government to provide unrestricted broadband,” he said. “And that includes not just liberal states, but conservative states. … And what they find on average is when the government starts providing this service, cost goes down and speed goes up.”

Which, he says, is something we could all use. Everyone would benefit from cheaper internet at faster speeds, Hansen said.

“At the very least, it gives us another option. Again, at the worst, OK, they can’t make it work, big deal. You’re stuck with whatever it is you have now,” he added.

Another argument is that it would cost money for the government to buy the land, the cable, and build the infrastructure needed to make this happen.

“For sure,” Hansen said. “And I think there is federal money available to make this easier. That’s what my people in Kitsap County told us, and so that will give them some help. But no question, right? It’s an expensive proposition. That’s probably the reason that some of the infrastructure isn’t there now. But again, if it’s expensive, … and they can’t figure out a way to make it pencil out, OK, fine, they just won’t offer it.”

Taking away the restrictions doesn’t solve the whole problem, Hansen admits, but taking them away at least allows for the opportunity to try to solve the problem with whatever federal money or “anything that they could get their hands on to help them.”

Seattle CEO: GameStop stock controversy has implications that go beyond Wall Street

For those people, who as Gee points out, don’t want the government involved, but also don’t want to be forced to use one internet provider, Hansen says no one would be forced to use any particular service, rather it would just be another option.

“You’re not going to be forced to use government anything,” he said. “But if the government can come in and give you an option, then you’re not forced to use whoever your existing bad, expensive internet provider is. You might have … some more choices. That’s I think what we all can come together on and want.”

Listen to the Gee and Ursula Show weekday mornings from 9 a.m. – 12 p.m. on KIRO Radio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the podcast here.

Gee and Ursula Show

Gee and Ursula

Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

Reykdal: Schools must ‘make tough choices’ with consolidation plans

Superintendant Chris Reykdal talks about the state, the education system, and how recent changes to taxes affects school funding.
5 days ago
downtown Seattle...
Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

Gee & Ursula debate suspension of downtown business taxes

Seattle business leaders are asking the city to suspend the B&O and JumpStart tax for the next three years as a way to revitalize downtown.
9 days ago
eviction notice...
Frank Sumrall

Eviction notices one of most dangerous jobs a police officer faces

Assaults on officers in Washington state increased in 2022 by nearly 20%. For those serving eviction notices, the percentage nearly doubles.
10 days ago
Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

Gee Scott: Trump ‘has to go to jail, it’s not rocket science’

Former President Donald Trump claimed “illegal leaks” indicated he would be arrested Tuesday through posts on Truth Social.
12 days ago
downtown Seattle...
Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

G&U: Why is $100,000 worth equivalent to $49,000 in Seattle?

According to a SmartAsset report, $100,000 in Seattle is worth to roughly $49,000 after adjusting for taxes and cost of living.
12 days ago
downtown Seattle...
Bill Kaczaraba

Big ideas for the city from the head of the Downtown Seattle Association

Jon Scholes, President and CEO of the Downtown Seattle Association (DSA), has some big ideas on how to bring downtown back to its former glory.
16 days ago

Sponsored Articles

Compassion International...

Brock Huard and Friends Rally Around The Fight for First Campaign

Professional athletes are teaming up to prevent infant mortality and empower women at risk in communities facing severe poverty.
Emergency Preparedness...

Prepare for the next disaster at the Emergency Preparedness Conference

Being prepared before the next emergency arrives is key to preserving businesses and organizations of many kinds.
SHIBA volunteer...

Volunteer to help people understand their Medicare options!

If you’re retired or getting ready to retire and looking for new ways to stay active, becoming a SHIBA volunteer could be for you!
safety from crime...

As crime increases, our safety measures must too

It's easy to be accused of fearmongering regarding crime, but Seattle residents might have good reason to be concerned for their safety.
Comcast Ready for Business Fund...
Ilona Lohrey | President and CEO, GSBA

GSBA is closing the disparity gap with Ready for Business Fund

GSBA, Comcast, and other partners are working to address disparities in access to financial resources with the Ready for Business fund.

Medicare open enrollment is here and SHIBA can help!

The SHIBA program – part of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner – is ready to help with your Medicare open enrollment decisions.
Washington lawmaker says letting government offer internet ‘gives us another option’