Seattle celebrates a reverend committed to Jesus Christ

Yesterday Seattle citizens marched in celebration of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a man who committed his life to the model set by Jesus Christ.

The reverend was a brave, flawed, fearless, imperfect, loving, passionate, committed man of justice. He was a soul openly driven by the teachings of his savior, Jesus Christ. It was refreshing to watch Seattle liberals celebrate a man who openly lived his faith which, in King’s day, flew in the face of what was the Democratic Party ethos. It was refreshing because the modern Democratic Party wants to crush the public display of religious faith in the name of enforcing the official, party-state view of things.

RELATED: Thousands march in Seattle on MLK Day

In his model of faith, the reverend sought true equality to battle obscene inequality: government neutrality in pursuit of life, liberty and happiness; even-handedness in application of the law. This is in direct opposition to the Party of Brute Force where government power will force: artists to create; little girls to shut-up about the naked man in their shower at the gym; and federal court nominees with Christian values to undergo witch trial-like questioning.

Modern leftists want equality to mean the smallest possible group of people deciding what the largest possible group of people get to keep from the efforts of their work, as well as the beliefs they get to espouse outside of their weird little buildings with those crosses on them.

Yesterday, Reverend King was called by the dominant media (the lap dog to dominant leftism): Dr. King, a Socialist, King, King, Jr., an anti-Global Warming crusader, a civil rights leader. Few people in the media called the reverend what he himself said he wanted to be: a model of Jesus Christ — however human and imperfect.

To call Dr. King what he called himself would throw into question the left’s modern commitment to carrying out the work of Barack Obama, who habitually erased “endowed by their Creator” from the Declaration of Independence. Or Hillary Clinton who downgraded the right to religious freedom (meaning to live your faith fully) to the “right to worship” (which means, in your weird, little church). And the Democratic Party who three times — that’s Biblical, don’t you know? — tried to remove “God” from the DNC Platform.

After all, how can government be all powerful, picking all of life’s winners and losers, determining which citizens have the right to compel other citizens to create forced-speech art for them, with all sorts of pesky reverends running around worshiping a God that doesn’t even donate to the party?