DAVE ROSS

US considers expansion to selective service to be gender neutral

Jun 14, 2021, 9:02 AM | Updated: 9:03 am
selective service...
A U.S. Army soldier looks onto Baghdad from a perimeter guardhouse of the International Zone on May 30, 2021 in Baghdad, Iraq. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
(Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

The U.S. Supreme Court recently passed up on the opportunity to decide that women ought to have to register for the draft at age 18, just the way men do. Rob McKenna, former state attorney general, explains why they passed on this.

King County Council’s ban of facial recognition technology is ‘misguided’

“Well, as Justice Sotomayor wrote in a statement, which they normally don’t issue, … but she issued a statement that Justice Kavanaugh joined and Justice Breyer also joins basically boiling down to the court’s, quote, ‘long-standing deference to Congress on matters of national defense and military affairs,'” McKenna said. “But also citing the fact that Congress is actively considering this very issue: Should selective service be made gender neutral and apply to everybody in the country?”

“I think the court is not willing to step into this when it’s obvious that Congress is thinking about making a change to the law,” he added.

The case was brought before the court by the National Coalition for Men and others, as well as by the ACLU.

“I’m not clear on whether the argument is that this is unfair to men or it’s unfair to women,” McKenna said. “But one of the arguments that they make in their … petition for review … is that this idea that women can’t be drafted really is not good for them because it sends a message about their role in society and whatnot.”

“But the main argument that they make in the case they brought in the District Court and then went to the Fifth Circuit, is that the Supreme Court’s earlier ruling from 1981 a case called Rostker, in which a challenge to selective service being limited to men was also brought — the basis for the Supreme Court’s decision upholding that law has changed.”

In that 1981 case, the Supreme Court said men and women were not similarly situated because, at the time, women were excluded from combat roles.

“That’s changed,” McKenna said. “As Justice Sotomayor noted in her statement, the role of women began to change dramatically back in 1991, and by 2012 or ’13, the prohibition against women in combat was officially lifted. Or I guess it was as of 2015.”

“So as she’s put it, as of 2015, there are no longer any positions in the United States Armed Forces closed to women. So that, according to the petitioners — National Coalition of Men, ACLU — sort of pulls the rug out from under the earlier decision, Rostker, which based its ruling on the fact that women were at that time excluded from combat.”

McKenna thinks part of the reason why Justice Sotomayor issued a statement was to make it clear that declining to review this case was not a comment on whether women should be in combat.

“They were just saying we’re going to defer to the legislative branch here,” he noted. “And there was kind of a hint in her statement that we’re watching this. But since Congress seems to be moving in this direction, let’s let Congress fix it as a legislative matter and not decide that it’s a violation of the Fifth Amendment for women to be excluded, which is essentially what they would have to find, because the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from discriminating on the basis of sex unless there’s a, quote, ‘exceedingly persuasive justification.'”

“And if women are in combat, it would appear there is no longer a persuasive justification for excluding them from selective service,” McKenna added.

Former state AG: Ability to fire officers for off-duty actions depends on belief and behavior

So is Congress likely to act to draft women, and will stand up to legal scrutiny?

“I don’t think there’s going to be any constitutional problem if selective service is made gender neutral, because the argument that’s being brought in the case the Supreme Court just decided not to hear is that it’s discriminatory that it only applies to men,” McKenna said. “And that’s the same argument that was made in Rostker v Goldberg back in 1981 where several young men who were subject to the draft registration requirement challenged it as unlawful sex discrimination.”

“If you make it gender neutral, then by definition there is no discrimination based on sex,” he added.

Listen to Seattle’s Morning News weekday mornings from 5 – 9 a.m. on KIRO Radio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the podcast here.

Dave Ross on KIRO Radio 97.3 FM
  • listen to dave rossTune in to KIRO Radio weekdays at 5am for Dave Ross on Seattle's Morning News.

Dave's Commentary

Dave Ross

unemployment...
Dave Ross

Ross: The real reason people don’t want to return to work

The extra unemployment benefits were cut off in September and most states elected not to continue them. Yet, millions of workers are still holding out.
3 days ago
Shatner, space...
Dave Ross

Ross: Shatner’s emotional response over trip to space exactly what we needed to hear

Space travel is a trip that every billionaire who thinks he’s a master of the universe needs to take as soon as possible.
4 days ago
Airlines...
Dave Ross

Ross: Choosing the fully-vaccinated airline that makes you feel safest

Two airlines – Southwest and American –both based in Texas, have decided to stick with their plans to require employees to get vaccinated.
5 days ago
Jan. 6, US Capitol...
MyNorthwest Staff

Committee investigating Jan. 6 pushes for details from White House aides

Washington Post's David Fahrenthold discusses the investigation into Jan. 6, with subpoenas now sent to some of former President Trump's closest aides.
6 days ago
TikTok...
Dave Ross

Ross: Down the rabbit hole as TikTok challenges take on life of their own

Just remember kids, you’re responsible for your conduct no matter what website put you up to it, whether it's TikTok or somewhere else.
6 days ago
Merck's...
MyNorthwest Staff

Mercer Island MD: New accessible COVID treatment is ‘necessary step’

A new COVID-19 treatment is on the horizon. Merck’s new COVID treatment — available in pill form — has been submitted to the FDA.
7 days ago

Sponsored Articles

...

How to Have a Stress-Free Real Estate Experience

The real estate industry has adapted and sellers are taking full advantage of new real estate models. One of which is Every Door Real Estate.
...
IQ Air

How Poor Air Quality Is Affecting Our Future Athletes

You cannot control your child’s breathing environment 100% of the time, but you can make a huge impact.
...
Swedish Health Services

Special Coverage: National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month

There are a wide variety of treatment options available for men with prostate cancer. The most technologically advanced treatment option in the Northwest is Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy using the CyberKnife platform.
...
Marysville Police Department

Police Opportunities in a Growing, Supportive Washington Community

Marysville PD is looking for both lateral and entry level officers. Begin or continue your career in law enforcement for a growing, supportive community.
...
Comcast

Small, Minority-Owned Businesses in King County and Pierce County Can Now Apply For $10,000 Relief Grants Through Comcast RISE

Businesses in King County and Pierce County can apply beginning on October 1, 2021, at www.ComcastRISE.com for a chance to receive a $10,000 relief grant.
Courtesy of JWatch Photography....
Experience Anacortes

Summer Fun Activities in Anacortes

With minimal travel time required and every activity under the sun, Anacortes is the perfect vacation spot for all ages.
US considers expansion to selective service to be gender neutral