DAVE ROSS

Ross: Turning the Constitution on itself

Nov 21, 2023, 9:01 AM | Updated: Dec 6, 2023, 11:36 am

FILE - Former President Donald Trump waits to take the witness stand during his civil fraud trial a...

FILE - Former President Donald Trump waits to take the witness stand during his civil fraud trial at New York Supreme Court. (Brendan McDermid/Pool Photo via AP)

(Brendan McDermid/Pool Photo via AP)

In a hearing before the DC Court of Appeals, Donald Trump’s attorney argued that the First Amendment protects his political speech and that the gag order against him in the election tampering case is unconstitutional.

The reason the judge imposed the gag order was the fear that Trump’s social media posts could lead to threats against the court staff – as seemed to happen after his indictment last August when he posted on Truth Social, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you.”

A few days later, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan received a voicemail death threat from a woman in Texas. But at yesterday’s hearing, Trump’s lawyer downplayed that threat, basically saying the caller was a crackpot.

“That particular threatener is an unemployed, mentally unstable, heavy alcoholic who sits on her couch, drinking beer all day, according to her father, never leaves the apartment and watches the news,” John Sauer, one of Trump’s attorneys, said. “She doesn’t get her news from social media. Then she makes angry threatening calls.”

So, no big deal and clearly no reason to gag his client.

Another Dave Ross Commentary: Helping the hungry comes with gratitude that goes both ways

And that prompted Appeals Court Judge Patricia Millet to challenge Trump’s attorney with a series of hypothetical situations, including this one:

“So is it your position that if he communicates through a social media post, ‘Hey witness X, I know the prosecutor is bothering you trying to get you say bad things about me, be patriot. Don’t cooperate.’ Does that communication violate the release condition?” Circuit Judge Patricia Millett asked.

Trump’s attorney was very reluctant to answer.

“In the context of a political campaign, what is implied as a threat here is core political speech,” Sauer said. “I can’t emphasize that enough.”

Implying there were circumstances where that MIGHT actually be protected free speech.

This will all go before the Supreme Court – but what I was hearing from Trump’s lawyer is an argument that running for political office might allow you to invoke the First Amendment in novel ways. Because if the theme of your campaign is government reform, criticism of the court – which is an arm of the government – would be protected speech.

Imagine an America where drug traffickers could simply announce a presidential campaign, and then, while they’re out on bail, send out social media posts saying – “hey witness X – you might want to save some seats for us at your Thanksgiving dinner in case we stop by…”

And it would all be protected by the First Amendment.

Let Freedom Ring!

Listen to Seattle’s Morning News with Dave Ross and Colleen O’Brien weekday mornings from 5 – 9 a.m. on KIRO Newsradio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the podcast here.

Dave's Commentary

Dave Ross on KIRO Newsradio 97.3 FM
  • listen to dave rossTune in to KIRO Newsradio weekdays at 5am for Dave Ross on Seattle's Morning News.

Dave Ross

supreme court pro-life...

Dave Ross

Ross: Supreme Court rules against pro-life challenge, so what’s next for the Christian Nationalists?

The Supreme Court last week unanimously turned down the pro-life challenge to the FDA’s decision to make Mifepristone widely available.

3 days ago

luxury lane toll...

Dave Ross

Ross: Let the rich pay the exorbitant ‘luxury lane’ toll prices

The new higher tolls for solo drivers in the luxury lane are hitting the $15 maximum every rush hour, all to save exactly three minutes of driving.

10 days ago

trump belltown hellcat...

Dave Ross

Ross: If popularity creates immunity, maybe the ‘Belltown Hellcat Bandit’ should run for president

A lot of completely normal Americans believe Trump should have gone free, and he probably will because of his popularity.

16 days ago

forever chemicals living defensively...

Dave Ross

Ross: Living defensively has its limits when facing ‘forever chemicals’

The trouble is that "living defensively" has its limits – as we heard when 3M lost control of its "forever chemicals."

28 days ago

Image: In this photo illustration, the logos of social media applications Instagram, Facebook, Link...

Dave Ross

Ross: If you hope the government will save kids from social media, think again

Social media firm TikTok must sell itself to a non-Chinese company, or it goes dark in the U.S. But that law is headed straight to court.

1 month ago

kristi noem book...

Dave Ross

Ross: Gov. Kristi Noem’s new book includes alleged meetings with dictators, dead dogs

Did South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem meet with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un as she claims in her new book?

1 month ago

Ross: Turning the Constitution on itself