Edison's light bulbs do a slow fadeon January 6, 2014 @ 7:46 am (Updated: 10:00 am - 1/6/14 )
But in 2011, Tea Party supporters like Congressman Mike Burgess of Texas pushed back. They said the ban was an assault on personal liberty and not only that, "Those of us of a certain age, under compact florescent bulb, don't look as good as we do under an incandescent bulb."
Determined to preserve the members' good looks, Congress approved a delay, and the 100 watt bulb hung on.
But now here we are in 2014, and as of Jan. 1, the ban on manufacturing old-style bulbs is finally in effect - with barely a peep of protest from the Tea Party or anyone else.
Why? Take a look at a home improvement store. Have you ever seen more types of lights? From bulbs that change color by remote control to Christmas lights that are basically immortal.
It's true, the first curly fluorescents were like low-flush toilets - you flipped the switch and nothing seemed to happen.
But now - those new LEDs are blinding. I put four of them in the bathroom - you turn them on, it's like a flying saucer just landed!
Yes, they're way more expensive to buy, but much less expensive to turn on, since they use 90 percent less electricity and in normal use can last as long as 46 years.
Not only will I never have to replace them, I can pass them on to my children!
Now, as the Congressman said, "We don't look as good as we do under an incandescent bulb."
And it's true, just because a bulb uses 90 percent less energy, it doesn't mean your face will look better.
But it can make your bottom line a lot less ugly.
Pike Place Market unveils plans for a dramatic $65 million makeover
Pension No More
Boeing announces it's ending pension plans for 68,000 non-union employees
Please login below with your Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or Disqus account. Existing MyNorthwest account holders will need to create a new Disqus account or use one of the social logins provided below. Thank you.