KTTH OPINION

Rantz: Kamala Harris chose antisemitic base over Josh Shapiro with Tim Walz pick

Aug 6, 2024, 11:30 AM | Updated: 11:34 am

Photo: Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro speaks during a campaign rally for Vice President Kamala ...

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro speaks during a campaign rally for Vice President Kamala Harris on July 29, 2024 in Ambler, Pennsylvania. (Photo: Hannah Beier, Getty Images)

(Photo: Hannah Beier, Getty Images)

As a Jewish American and voter who supports conservatives, my expectations from the Democrats are rarely high. Yet, the recent decision to select Tim Walz as vice president over Josh Shapiro leaves me deeply concerned about the rise of antisemitism within the Democrat’s progressive base. The choice of Walz is more than a political maneuver; it is a clear capitulation to the antisemitic progressive base that continues to take over the Democrat party.

Antisemitism in the Democratic Party isn’t some phantom menace; it’s a tangible, growing cancer highlighted by the Josh Shapiro snub. We’ve witnessed anti-Israel protests that quickly morph into outright Jew-hatred, members of Congress amplifying Hamas talking points and the shameful boycott of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress.

These aren’t isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of hostility towards Jews and Israel, thinly veiled as political dissent.

More from Jason Rantz: Seattle has an antisemitism problem. It’s not surprising

How have Democrats embraced antisemitism in the Josh Shapiro snub?

Consider the anti-Israel protests that have taken place across the country, often endorsed by progressive leaders. These demonstrations devolve into antisemitic rants, with chants of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” a call for the eradication of the Jewish state. It’s not just rhetoric — it’s a call for genocide, and it’s being tolerated, if not outright endorsed, by many from the base of the party.

Then there’s the cheerleading for Hamas. “Squad” members like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Pramila Jayapal characterized Israel’s self-defense against Hamas rockets as the problem, while downplaying the very real threat posed by an organization whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel. They either dismissed or turned a blind eye to the atrocities committed by Hamas terrorists against innocent Israeli women. Their positions aren’t criticism of Israeli policy; it’s support for a terrorist organization dedicated to killing Jews.

And who could ignore the disgraceful boycott of Netanyahu’s address to Congress? When Democratic leaders chose to skip a speech by the Prime Minister of Israel, our closest ally in the Middle East, they sent a clear message: Jewish concerns are secondary to appeasing their increasingly radical base. And it’s some of the very people who boycotted the speech who reportedly had influence on Harris’ choice of Walz over Shapiro.

More from Jason Rantz: Antisemitic ‘teach-in’ told students Hamas are ‘resistance fighters’

Josh Shapiro could have been a turning point

Josh Shapiro’s candidacy represented a potential turning point. As a more moderate Democrat and a proud Jew, Shapiro could have signaled a firm stance against antisemitism, a much-needed rebuke to the toxic elements within the party. It also would have helped Harris win in Pennsylvania, a state that she almost certainly must win in order to take the White House. But instead, the Democratic leadership chose Tim Walz, a far-left progressive who only reminds voters of Harris’ own extremism, all to avoid antisemitic controversy rather than confront it.

Why was Shapiro overlooked? The answer, sadly, seems to lie in his Jewish identity. In a party where antisemitic voices continue to gain power, a Jewish candidate like Shapiro was always going to face an uphill battle. It’s a tragic irony that the party, that prides itself on inclusivity and fighting discrimination, would shun a candidate precisely because of his faith.

Choosing Shapiro would have been more than a symbolic gesture. It would have been a strong, unequivocal statement that the Democratic Party stands against antisemitism. It would have shown that the party values the principles of equality and justice over pandering to extremists. And it was the wisest strategic move electorally.

But the decision to go with Walz indicates a troubling acceptance, if not endorsement, of the antisemitic undercurrents within the party. By not taking a firm stand against antisemitism, and letting progressives sandbag Shapiro’s chances of being chosen for the ticket, it allows the poison to spread, affecting policy decisions, future candidate selections, and the overall tone of the party.

More from Jason Rantz: Kirkland Hamas rally celebrated terrorist attacks against Israel

There’s now a concrete way to defeat antisemitism

For those of us who are both deeply concerned about antisemitism and politically conservative, this is a stark reminder that the fight against hate is far from over. Antisemitism requires constant vigilance and opposition.

As a Jewish Republican, I find myself in the unenviable position of wanting Kamala Harris to lose but also recognizing the missed opportunity for the Democrats to take a stand against antisemitism. But I’m a Jewish American before I’m a conservative voter. And while a Harris/Shapiro ticket would be more difficult for Trump/Vance to beat, it would help me and my fellow Jews feel less concerned should our Star of David necklaces peek from underneath our shirts. I never thought I’d be this uncomfortable being visibly Jewish in Seattle, where I live, given the insufferable declarations by locals about how accepting they are.

Choosing Walz over Shapiro is not merely a political decision; it’s a moral failing. It demonstrates that Democratic leadership is more concerned with appeasing its radical base than standing up for what is right.

However, there’s some solace in this: while “fighting antisemitism” might be a nebulous task, opposing a Harris/Walz ticket and the message it sends to the antisemitic Democrat base is much more straightforward. And when we win, it will be that much more fulfilling.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here. Follow Jason on X, formerly known as TwitterInstagram and Facebook.

Jason Rantz on AM 770 KTTH
  • listen to jason rantzTune in to AM 770 KTTH weekdays at 3-7pm toThe Jason Rantz Show.

Jason Rantz Show

KTTH Opinion

Image: Washington Gov. Jay Inslee delivers his annual State of the State address to a joint legisla...

Jason Rantz

Rantz: You’re about to be hit with new taxes in Washington and you don’t even know it yet

Thanks to questionable spending by Democrats in Olympia, Washington will get hit with sky-high taxes and locals have no idea it's coming.

3 hours ago

...

MyNorthwest Video

Video: When Did People Forget How to Walk Normal?

Did you know there was a correct way to walk through a crosswalk? Jason Rantz does, and he is willing to walk over anyone who gets in his way… as long as they’re smaller and weaker. Here’s to another Double Shot.☕☕ Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on […]

3 hours ago

...

MyNorthwest Video

Video: Seattle Mayor turns a Christmas tradition into a political event

Seattle mayor Bruce Harrell had one job at last week’s Christmas tree lighting ceremony: lead the countdown, smile, and let families revel in the holiday spirit. Instead, he decided to hijack the event with a meandering political monologue he didn’t fully memorize, transforming what should have been a unifying moment into another reminder of how […]

4 hours ago

...

MyNorthwest Video

Video: New TikTok Trend #50firstdates is Not a Good Idea

Here go again with another TikTok trend. The trend is #50firstdates, where girls go out on dates and bring us all along on the journey. 50 times! Jason Rantz & Jake Skorheim share their thoughts about this and Adam Sandler on an all-new Double Shot. ☕️☕ Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from 3 […]

1 day ago

...

MyNorthwest Video

Video: Gov. Jay Inslee issues spending freeze. Why?

Governor Jay Inslee mandated a spending freeze on most non-essential hiring, service contracts, purchasing, and travel for state agencies to address a significant budget shortfall. Jason Rantz thinks it could be one of two things. Jay Inslee is lying, or they just spent a ton of money. Listen to The Jason Rantz Show weekdays from […]

1 day ago

Image: A Seattle Police Department vehicle is seen responding to an incident in November 2024....

Jason Rantz

Rantz Exclusive: Year-end Seattle Police staffing is dire, but union warns of new looming crisis

Seattle Police are still struggling with historically low staffing levels. And there may be a bigger problem just around the corner.

1 day ago

Rantz: Kamala Harris chose antisemitic base over Josh Shapiro with Tim Walz pick