KIRO NEWSRADIO OPINION

Gee: Wait, what?! I thought socialism was bad

Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM | Updated: 4:22 pm

Trump (1)...

President Donald Trump. (Photo: Spencer Platt, Getty Images)

(Photo: Spencer Platt, Getty Images)

Help me understand something. Some conservatives are cheering a Trump administration proposal, championed by JD Vance, that would let qualifying married couples receive federal child care money when one parent works and the other stays home raising the kids. Other conservatives are pushing back, calling it socialism. The proposal hasn’t been finalized.

First, raising children is work. Anyone who thinks staying home with little kids is a vacation needs to spend eight hours negotiating with a three-year-old. I get why a family would need that support. I’m writing this to try to figure out how the people celebrating this have dismissed other government assistance as “socialism.”

Has your understanding of why families need help changed, or did you become more comfortable with who would receive it? Government assistance isn’t automatically socialism, but if that’s the word you’ve used to shut down conversations about helping struggling families, I just want to understand how it doesn’t apply here.

More families would compete for the same funding; how do we decide who gets the help?

Where’s the line with this? Is it cost? Is it need? Is it whether the program works? Tell me how this decision is made, and whether it’s applied consistently.

The reported proposal would draw from an existing fund that helps working parents afford child care. This would expand eligibility without adding money, and more families would essentially be competing for the same assistance. That’s when I’d like to know: how do we decide who gets the help? The married parent staying home matters. The single mother who needs child care to keep her job matters. The couple working multiple jobs to stay afloat, yep, matters.

Those families are slightly different, but they’re still trying to raise their children and pay their bills. I’m just trying to make sure that we don’t fall into the “these are the families I approve of” agenda. A parent’s need for help doesn’t become more of a priority based on the type of household arrangement or demographic. After writing all this, I’m starting to think that just maybe we don’t have an issue with helping, but we might have one with the ones that get help.

Listen to Gee and Ursula on “The Gee and Ursula Show” weekday mornings from 9 am to 12 pm on KIRO Newsradio.

Please follow our Community Guidelines

Gee and Ursula Show

KIRO Newsradio Opinion

Wilson...

Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

‘The mayor’s office is allergic to the truth’: Gee fires back after SPD report points directly at Wilson over Bite of Seattle delay

Nearly two months of finger-pointing over the Bite of Seattle shooting news conference delay ended Tuesday with a simple answer.

10 hours ago

seattle grocery crime plan...

Gee Scott and Ursula Reutin Show

‘We cannot deal with the level of crime’: Ursula suggest $1.7M grocery plan reveals what Seattle can’t fix

Seattle will put $1.7 million into grocery store security and food access. Ursula says the funding is welcome but doesn't address the poverty behind the theft.

11 hours ago

Trump (1)...

Gee Scott

Gee: Wait, what?! I thought socialism was bad

Explore why some conservatives support Trump's socialism proposal and its implications for married couples and families.

12 hours ago

edmonds parental rights fight...

Jake Skorheim and Spike O'Neill Show

‘Parents deserve a seat at the table’: Jake ties the Edmonds school scandal to the broader parental rights fight

Jake Skorheim connects the Edmonds scandal to the parental rights fight, emphasizing the need for parental involvement in education.

18 hours ago

seattle mayor katie wilson hostage video...

Jake Skorheim and Spike O'Neill Show

‘Looks like a hostage video’: Jake breaks down Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson’s progressive efficiency pitch

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson released a roughly 100-second video on social media arguing that "effective government is a progressive value."

19 hours ago

natural gas vote initiative 2066...

Charlie Harger

Harger: Nearly 2 million voted to protect natural gas. Four topics on one page killed it

Nearly 2 million Washingtonians voted to protect natural gas in 2024 with Initiative 2066, and last Thursday the Washington State Supreme Court struck it down.

21 hours ago

Gee: Wait, what?! I thought socialism was bad