Washington Representative weighs in on one of the most controversial bills this session
Feb 17, 2025, 6:08 PM | Updated: Feb 18, 2025, 8:05 am
Exterior of the Washington state Capitol campus. (Photo: Julia Dallas, MyNorthwest)
(Photo: Julia Dallas, MyNorthwest)
House Bill 1296 (HB 1296) is shaping up to be one of the most talked about bills this Washington Legislative session.
Washington Republican Representative Jim Walsh confirmed to “The John Curley Show” Monday that HB 1269 is definitely the bill he gets the most calls about.
Parental rights showdown: WA lawmakers accuse one another of lying about student privacy
The bill aims to modify parts of Initiative 2081, known as the Parents’ Bill of Rights. HB 1296 seeks to revert back to a 48-hour notification rule, which had been in place for 20 years. Democrats argue this time frame allows school officials and law enforcement to properly assess situations before informing parents. Republicans argue that delaying notification weakens parental rights.
Earlier this month, Washington Democratic Senator Jamie Pedersen had a few standout comments concerning House Bill 1296. Pedersen argues the bill clarifies ambiguities and protects student privacy, particularly for LGBTQ+ students and victims of abuse.
“Kids over 13 have the complete right to make their own decisions about their mental health care. Parents don’t have a right to have notice, they don’t have a right to have consent about that,” Pedersen said.
Jake Skorheim, co-host of “The Jake and Spike Show” on KIRO Newsradio was taken aback by Pedersen’s comments.
“When I saw this, I was like, there must be a mistake,” Jake said. “It must be the wrong snippet. He can’t possibly believe that. I mean, I assume this man has, I think he has children of his own. He can’t possibly think that a 13-year-old shouldn’t have a parent notified if they’re going to make decisions that might alter the rest of their life without their parents being at least read into what’s happening.”
‘Why would he say that?’ Jake & Spike break down senator’s controversial Parents’ Bill of Rights comments
Washington HB 1296 vs The Mature Minor Doctrine
However, HB 1296 has been confused with The Mature Minor Doctrine, which “allows health care providers to treat youth under the age of eighteen as adults based upon an assessment and documentation of the youth’s maturity,” as stated on King County’s website. But HB 1296 only seeks to change the timeframe schools notify parents of medical concerns regarding their children.
“The Parents’ Bill of Rights is a separate section of law,” Walsh explained. “It is strictly about notification and information. It doesn’t change the Mature Minor Doctrine. All the Parents’ Bill of Rights says is the parents have to be notified if the minor child is really having any significant health care, mental health or physical health care, or being exposed to things at school. And the largest piece of it is actually the school part, but that also does cover some medical health care treatments, therapies, services that a minor child gets. All the Parents’ Bill of Rights says is a parent or legal guardian, and they have to be custodial, custodial parent or legal guardian is notified.”
To listen to the full conversation, where John and Walsh delve more into the Mature Minor Doctrine, click the player below:
Contributing: Matt Markovich, KIRO Newsradio
Listen to John Curley on “The John Curley Show” weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KIRO Newsradio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to the podcast here.
Julia Dallas is a content editor at MyNorthwest. You can read her stories here. Follow Julia on X here and email her here.

